From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E7AC54EAA for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 19:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232629AbjA0Trr (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:47:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51704 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232699AbjA0Trc (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:47:32 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91D5F59249 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:44:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id nn18-20020a17090b38d200b0022bfb584987so5716020pjb.2 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:44:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4FpsNM4Bdeby2MkenGuWGLbgk6pVqfQ79XLW3mUcsw8=; b=F2vvZ4cY3XujJxcvSFPPFbA0T4QFWceX/SZWDjzEBQBsDpjiwkvUCKcwp/10z9aejk 1W3DC675aeH2QMNG4B6W+Ub7kYV/QhY72iMcK3/Lxu/VhH2YP3UvGbqkf4MqZh23IT0L dvjoOW5AA+2ue6XtiKzFEjeejdjicP8045Bab1vFTCB1zUGCD6ynMyjklQzhxyvlUlsz cpZDKjezmKc1h5jiNlaWflutTuEikyY8MKuKbiN81Haplm1kSBz0SjvaJLoOYwttQWZL wslXyaI3KJ+FVgMR+y1Ix6z7zlYgL0I9fU6526Y6hvZ+FcaeLl/tFjJuMJBXPQIvCPcB PCKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4FpsNM4Bdeby2MkenGuWGLbgk6pVqfQ79XLW3mUcsw8=; b=VFOjD063zrASOol6crG/LIDYRz+dYSPywDaT2Z8HrqxmQUwMSpR/1YbMn3W9nPGbkA 5ks2aILDZBKf3KvJcNxgkxvGFhFEWpco58pr8sauatHAB+gLGXrm1IuWoaJkKexp4D2s XHRAvv+h562+W1O7oLTVdQOU555D1wNmHX6nZ/ih2sH9m2xDCeJRJSFh52v+iuoH4bRi MnNpM/3JjVqxTrgRMSJqQJrqQql3fIrO+58MfJUM7gCCWTgTtdFf3R2oLdRdzgTRqlqA hxkEqjfbZ1I4BnVYJob+4yOwJUeH+JdnALe7bSii6mYRRHxyMTWzRkTbTTk0hKTeCMsZ syBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVlFvqErGpNFAcs/kY5vBvhzLtDeUnayquM8V+UdGEIFDmVUitS ilCYnllycmNHlQ6WD9bgn+DzCA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/JiYkD1dPFXX0spEZ4uMEWwjgdpN2oFU19P2Z0/IgGbk/hInjo9DftHh34XEOc/4I/lRZl0g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d4d1:b0:196:1f80:105a with SMTP id o17-20020a170902d4d100b001961f80105amr3004568plg.5.1674848620397; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:43:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.136] ([198.8.77.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c12-20020a170902d48c00b001894198d0ebsm3254490plg.24.2023.01.27.11.43.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:43:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <24fbe6cb-ee80-f726-b260-09f394ead764@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 12:43:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates Content-Language: en-US To: Paul Moore Cc: Richard Guy Briggs , Linux-Audit Mailing List , LKML , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Eric Paris , Steve Grubb , Stefan Roesch , Christian Brauner , Pavel Begunkov References: From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 1/27/23 12:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 1/27/23 10:23 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: >>> A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections suggested in >>> consultation with Steve Grubb. >>> >>> Richard Guy Briggs (2): >>> io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE >>> io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR >>> >>> io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them, just >> to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them up for 6.3. > > Please hold off until I've had a chance to look them over ... I haven't taken anything yet, for things like this I always let it simmer until people have had a chance to do so. -- Jens Axboe