From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Josef <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: io_uring file descriptor address already in use error
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:39:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAss7+r17LPZwun2ex4puSS_gkZz42p9s0Ta57yyD6XKV814oQ@mail.gmail.com>
> On Aug 26, 2020, at 12:26 PM, Josef <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 15:44, Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/25/20 9:01 PM, Josef wrote:
>>>> In order for the patch to be able to move ahead, we'd need to be able
>>>> to control this behavior. Right now we rely on the file being there if
>>>> we need to repoll, see:
>>>>
>>>> commit a6ba632d2c249a4390289727c07b8b55eb02a41d
>>>> Author: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Fri Apr 3 11:10:14 2020 -0600
>>>>
>>>> io_uring: retry poll if we got woken with non-matching mask
>>>>
>>>> If this never happened, we would not need the file at all and we could
>>>> make it the default behavior. But don't think that's solvable.
>>>>
>>>>> is there no other way around to close the file descriptor? Even if I
>>>>> remove the poll, it doesn't work
>>>>
>>>> If you remove the poll it should definitely work, as nobody is holding a
>>>> reference to it as you have nothing else in flight. Can you clarify what
>>>> you mean here?
>>>>
>>>> I don't think there's another way, outside of having a poll (io_uring
>>>> or poll(2), doesn't matter, the behavior is the same) being triggered in
>>>> error. That doesn't happen, as mentioned if you do epoll/poll on a file
>>>> and you close it, it won't trigger an event.
>>>>
>>>>> btw if understood correctly poll remove operation refers to all file
>>>>> descriptors which arming a poll in the ring buffer right?
>>>>> Is there a way to cancel a specific file descriptor poll?
>>>>
>>>> You can cancel specific requests by identifying them with their
>>>> ->user_data. You can cancel a poll either with POLL_REMOVE or
>>>> ASYNC_CANCEL, either one will find it. So as long as you have that, and
>>>> it's unique, it'll only cancel that one specific request.
>>>
>>> thanks it works, my bad, I was not aware that user_data is associated
>>> with the poll request user_data...just need to remove my server socket
>>> poll which binds to an address so I think this patch is not really
>>> necessary
>>>
>>> btw IORING_FEAT_FAST_POLL feature which arming poll for read events,
>>> how does it work when the file descriptor(not readable yet) wants to
>>> read(non blocking) something and I close(2) the file descriptor? I'm
>>> guessing io_uring doesn't hold any reference to it anymore right?
>>
>> Most file types will *not* notify you through poll if they get closed,
>> so it'll just sit there until canceled. This is the same with poll(2) or
>> epoll(2). io_uring will continue to hold a reference to the file, it
>> does that over request completion for any request that uses a file.
>
>
> okay, btw according to the man page IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE it's unclear
> to me what value user_data contains in the cqe
> I'm guessing user_data is always 0 right? just tested it with liburing
> I got always 0(user_data) even if there is no polling request
The user_data is *always* passed straight from the sqe, so it is set to whatever you put in there. That’s a key component of the protocol, allowing you to tie a completion event back to your submission. And also allows you to do a directed cancel event for a given pending request.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 15:00 io_uring file descriptor address already in use error Josef
2020-08-25 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-25 15:17 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-25 15:48 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-25 16:38 ` Josef
2020-08-25 16:47 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-26 3:01 ` Josef
2020-08-26 13:44 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-26 18:25 ` Josef
2020-08-26 18:39 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox