From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.12 v2] io_uring: fix rw req completion
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:44:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1db1d9603cf6abb6de51a58fe6e966c7ea1e5d3.1617903478.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
On 08/04/2021 18:40, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> WARNING: at fs/io_uring.c:8578 io_ring_exit_work.cold+0x0/0x18
>
> As reissuing is now passed back by REQ_F_REISSUE, kiocb_done() may just
> set the flag and do nothing leaving dangling requests. The handling is a
> bit fragile, e.g. can't just complete them because the case of reading
> beyond file boundary needs blocking context to return 0, otherwise it
> may be -EAGAIN.
>
> Go the easy way for now, just emulate how it was by io_rw_reissue() in
> kiocb_done()
Need to adjust the message a bit, will resend
>
> Fixes: 230d50d448ac ("io_uring: move reissue into regular IO path")
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f602250d292f8a84cca9a01d747744d1e797be26.1617842918.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> v2: io_rw_reissue() may fail, check return code
>
> fs/io_uring.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index f1881ac0744b..f2df0569a60a 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -2762,6 +2762,7 @@ static void kiocb_done(struct kiocb *kiocb, ssize_t ret,
> {
> struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(kiocb, struct io_kiocb, rw.kiocb);
> struct io_async_rw *io = req->async_data;
> + bool check_reissue = (kiocb->ki_complete == io_complete_rw);
>
> /* add previously done IO, if any */
> if (io && io->bytes_done > 0) {
> @@ -2777,6 +2778,18 @@ static void kiocb_done(struct kiocb *kiocb, ssize_t ret,
> __io_complete_rw(req, ret, 0, issue_flags);
> else
> io_rw_done(kiocb, ret);
> +
> + if (check_reissue && req->flags & REQ_F_REISSUE) {
> + req->flags &= ~REQ_F_REISSUE;
> + if (!io_rw_reissue(req)) {
> + int cflags = 0;
> +
> + req_set_fail_links(req);
> + if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED)
> + cflags = io_put_rw_kbuf(req);
> + __io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, cflags);
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> static int io_import_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, int rw, struct iov_iter *iter)
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-08 17:40 [PATCH 5.12 v2] io_uring: fix rw req completion Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-08 17:44 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox