Re: [PATCH for-next] io_uring/query: check for loops in in_query()

[Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>]

On 9/16/25 19:35, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/16/25 12:33 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 9/16/25 9:05 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> I'd rather delay non fatal signals and even more so task work
>>> processing, it can't ever be reliable in general case otherwise
>>> and would always need to be executed in a loop. And the execution
>>> should be brief, likely shorter than non-interruptible sections
>>> of many syscalls. In this sense capping at 1000 can be a better
>>> choice.
>>
>> Let's just cap it at 1000, at least that's a more reasonable number. I
>> don't think there's a perfect way to solve this problem, outside of
>> being able to detect loops, but at least 1000 can be documented as the
>> max limit. Not that anyone would ever get anywhere near that...
> 
> Forgot to mention, but I'm assuming you'll send a v2 of the patch?

I assumed you'd want to squash something into your patch, but
I can send it out properly.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov