From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57661C433EF for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340BD61248 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232073AbhIOJlN (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 05:41:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49522 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237017AbhIOJlN (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 05:41:13 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59FE0C061574 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 02:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id i3so1629292wmq.3 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 02:39:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cvOAIIMa4ir4mtbjMNf7vuX/kLdm698F67r0e1lN2a8=; b=Jh2aTJsenszi4n9R89In03homzsfalN673CTjv8r62GHvWKLc0ouHNJSEoWgnP5hiB ZVGx2zeJR/jLUqVWEQk/9rJYuVpZ3iS6QffOLyM/3fCy5R3sP80YE0DvTet5ASgr+CUK Wq/wGKcVoJZ4xSVzYIHFYvKlNTFinfr2IoOeeGiRvPHE5J2ZTGfw++RA/tjPUKwIvXCF Il6m2Gcme9KCl30heHJIYNPR7YuV/KVtHff+TDN2Nwcbz3rYo2Beh0Zh6yDSpYY0Fgzr 9qoTY2tISfEvyYq+H4QGVaS4DW3IoI5XtMML3f7zttBjOB6WP940H0CmuPVS5bV3kVT7 efAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cvOAIIMa4ir4mtbjMNf7vuX/kLdm698F67r0e1lN2a8=; b=UKqhOevd0HOps4BbekoK8R/3/uErXkXkU576+x5OnfwKgaFJOdu+3/wQawldMmltNu u8DdxCqKgkZT3FtWYmd40z56EKsbYwxKfsD+dTjrHK8E7RUcqzUYRm+5zm3K+ES45cuD fOD7HzpoSOTVe7IlDRyJfXngWWI23oqJ/xt5NlqqgA1dxAAuxeZqoN2yhbdJG6ApeD7f ZlrSiYGfm6ghEHN99vEJL5nHYI8BeCtwmPCoGkNWWm+eeOJqFKealYpLby/VZpds5NKz 0jdfm4LlVVvMFXuKEk2Y/FEzdNYkAK0np514degUKcECOxOeOH8CVSgmFGB+I0JpH84+ 0S/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531N+t5aMsWygplD0ClJCZOTwt+XU7FA2l53YETUWty8KrTFcvoI Njx2zbtsoMy+vRo2Oat2kIa5VcIqCrQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxK57Bpec8lqoOtCoEi/aQKnltDH6lwwvYp7ozhXJHwbmrL1Xmrb4BtdaZk+VEPeRCeN6oM0g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c048:: with SMTP id u8mr3366417wmc.113.1631698792762; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 02:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.8.197] ([185.69.144.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z17sm2532471wml.24.2021.09.15.02.39.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 02:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: move iopoll reissue into regular IO path To: Jens Axboe , io-uring@vger.kernel.org References: <09c645bdf78117a5933490aff0eea10c4f1ceb0a.1631658805.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> From: Pavel Begunkov Message-ID: <28d60cb5-04fe-5213-83c7-7178bb9e06ac@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:39:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 9/15/21 2:14 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 9/14/21 4:34 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: >> 230d50d448acb ("io_uring: move reissue into regular IO path") >> made non-IOPOLL I/O to not retry from ki_complete handler. Follow it >> steps and do the same for IOPOLL. Same problems, same implementation, >> same -EAGAIN assumptions. > > This looks good to me. But I don't think it's against io_uring-5.15? > Trivial reject, but looks like -next to me. Was checking out to io_uring-5.15, apparently something gone wrong. Not only that, but also a chunk left un-amended... I'll resend against io_uring-5.15 -- Pavel Begunkov