From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: [PATCH] io-wq: use proper nesting IRQ disabling spinlocks for cancel
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:53:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
We don't know what context we'll be called in for cancel, it could very
well be with IRQs disabled already. Use the IRQ saving variants of the
locking primitives.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 3bbab2c58695..ba40a7ee31c3 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -642,19 +642,20 @@ static bool io_work_cancel(struct io_worker *worker, void *cancel_data)
{
struct io_cb_cancel_data *data = cancel_data;
struct io_wqe *wqe = data->wqe;
+ unsigned long flags;
bool ret = false;
/*
* Hold the lock to avoid ->cur_work going out of scope, caller
* may deference the passed in work.
*/
- spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&wqe->lock, flags);
if (worker->cur_work &&
data->cancel(worker->cur_work, data->caller_data)) {
send_sig(SIGINT, worker->task, 1);
ret = true;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wqe->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -669,9 +670,10 @@ static enum io_wq_cancel io_wqe_cancel_cb_work(struct io_wqe *wqe,
.caller_data = cancel_data,
};
struct io_wq_work *work;
+ unsigned long flags;
bool found = false;
- spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&wqe->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(work, &wqe->work_list, list) {
if (cancel(work, cancel_data)) {
list_del(&work->list);
@@ -679,7 +681,7 @@ static enum io_wq_cancel io_wqe_cancel_cb_work(struct io_wqe *wqe,
break;
}
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wqe->lock, flags);
if (found) {
work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
@@ -733,6 +735,7 @@ static enum io_wq_cancel io_wqe_cancel_work(struct io_wqe *wqe,
struct io_wq_work *cwork)
{
struct io_wq_work *work;
+ unsigned long flags;
bool found = false;
cwork->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
@@ -742,7 +745,7 @@ static enum io_wq_cancel io_wqe_cancel_work(struct io_wqe *wqe,
* from there. CANCEL_OK means that the work is returned as-new,
* no completion will be posted for it.
*/
- spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&wqe->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(work, &wqe->work_list, list) {
if (work == cwork) {
list_del(&work->list);
@@ -750,7 +753,7 @@ static enum io_wq_cancel io_wqe_cancel_work(struct io_wqe *wqe,
break;
}
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wqe->lock, flags);
if (found) {
work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
--
Jens Axboe
reply other threads:[~2019-11-05 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox