From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>,
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Xiaobing Li <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IO_URING: Statistics of the true utilization of sq threads.
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 02:41:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 9/28/23 2:37 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:01:14AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Now, I see what you're trying to do, but who actually uses this data?
>
> I ... don't. There seems to be the notion that since we're polling, that
> shouldn't count against the runtime of the thread. But the thread has
> chosen to poll! It is doing something! For one thing, it's preventing
> the CPU from entering an idle state. It seems absolutely fair to
> accuont this poll time to the runtime of the thread. Clearly i'm
> missing something.
For sure, it should be accounted as CPU time, as it is exactly that. You
could argue that if we needed to preempt this task for something else we
would do that (and the code does check that on every loop), but it's
still using CPU.
I can see maybe wanting to know how much of the total time the thread
spent doing ACTUAL work rather than just polling for new work, but
that's not really something the scheduler should be involved in and
should be purely an io_uring sqpoll stat of some sort if that is truly
interesting for an application.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-28 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20230928023004epcas5p4a6dac4cda9c867f3673690521a8c18b6@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2023-09-28 2:22 ` [PATCH 0/3] Sq thread real utilization statistics Xiaobing Li
[not found] ` <CGME20230928023007epcas5p276b6e029a67001a6ed8ab28c05b2be9c@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2023-09-28 2:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] SCHEDULER: Add an interface for counting real utilization Xiaobing Li
2023-09-28 7:52 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-28 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-29 0:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <CGME20230928023011epcas5p32668b193b447f1cd6bf78035f4894c42@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2023-09-28 2:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] PROC FILESYSTEM: Add real utilization data of sq thread Xiaobing Li
[not found] ` <CGME20230928023015epcas5p273b3eaebf3759790c278b03c7f0341c8@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2023-09-28 2:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] IO_URING: Statistics of the true utilization of sq threads Xiaobing Li
2023-09-28 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-28 8:23 ` Jens Axboe
2023-09-28 8:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-28 8:41 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-09-28 18:33 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox