From: David Wei <[email protected]>
To: David Ahern <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
Mina Almasry <[email protected]>,
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] netdev: add XDP_SETUP_ZC_RX command
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:37:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 25/08/2023 19:21, David Ahern wrote:
> On 8/25/23 6:19 PM, David Wei wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> index 08fbd4622ccf..a20a5c847916 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -1000,6 +1000,7 @@ enum bpf_netdev_command {
>> BPF_OFFLOAD_MAP_ALLOC,
>> BPF_OFFLOAD_MAP_FREE,
>> XDP_SETUP_XSK_POOL,
>> + XDP_SETUP_ZC_RX,
>
> Why XDP in the name? Packets go from nic to driver to stack to io_uring,
> no? That is not XDP.
This new bpf_netdev_command XDP_SETUP_ZC_RX mirrors XDP_SETUP_XSK_POOL above,
both in terms of naming and purpose (the arg structs are almost identical).
However, I dislike this way of toggling ZC RX support anyway and am happy to
change it to a better method e.g. properly supports namespaces.
>
>
>> };
>>
>> struct bpf_prog_offload_ops;
>> @@ -1038,6 +1039,11 @@ struct netdev_bpf {
>> struct xsk_buff_pool *pool;
>> u16 queue_id;
>> } xsk;
>> + /* XDP_SETUP_ZC_RX */
>> + struct {
>> + struct io_zc_rx_ifq *ifq;
>> + u16 queue_id;
>> + } zc_rx;
>> };
>> };
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-26 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-26 1:19 [RFC RESEND 00/11] Zero copy network RX using io_uring David Wei
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 01/11] io_uring: add interface queue David Wei
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 02/11] io_uring: add mmap support for shared ifq ringbuffers David Wei
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 03/11] netdev: add XDP_SETUP_ZC_RX command David Wei
2023-08-26 2:21 ` David Ahern
2023-08-26 21:37 ` David Wei [this message]
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 04/11] io_uring: setup ZC for an RX queue when registering an ifq David Wei
2023-08-26 2:26 ` David Ahern
2023-08-26 22:00 ` David Wei
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 05/11] io_uring: add ZC buf and pool David Wei
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 06/11] io_uring: add ZC pool API David Wei
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 07/11] skbuff: add SKBFL_FIXED_FRAG and skb_fixed() David Wei
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 08/11] io_uring: allocate a uarg for freeing zero copy skbs David Wei
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 09/11] io_uring: delay ZC pool destruction David Wei
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 10/11] netdev/bnxt: add data pool and use it in BNXT driver David Wei
2023-08-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 11/11] io_uring: add io_recvzc request David Wei
2023-10-22 19:06 ` [RFC RESEND 00/11] Zero copy network RX using io_uring Gal Pressman
2023-10-23 3:35 ` David Wei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-25 22:55 [RFC PATCH " David Wei
2023-08-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 03/11] netdev: add XDP_SETUP_ZC_RX command David Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox