From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2382CC433E1 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8382065E for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="IiZArhaM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726411AbgGXTXN (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:23:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36836 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726381AbgGXTXN (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:23:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com (mail-pg1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57750C0619D3 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id j19so5865234pgm.11 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:23:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w2NaCjbBDiQGc9B3pS2XLjC72qctmFrNuT1yGCXH9VI=; b=IiZArhaMTedNICtv7CUQvWMMgmFfVzEqCwrvTOCIN0YoqJKczqGOKvZFn81ZdH8LGY MQYJjThpc5nCcbh9A6z0bl8G0Fy8pM0Ct/NuYSYOMR/o3ih/S0eY5m9QSf9tK1OoxP2m LLUBbVQGM88+iIm4dJxWrkHkTaybtj0OjMcR/hAbL/jCihrsVA8E7INfa0mub79QcyAu A5IBwU8IlQu9EgkrdzgKQa9EsQVMn/q8MG7AbU2GgpJEpNxRHB6/9fBI7RMVYpN2+QsO AGaoIOWOsQEnOnbxnIVTi7Rr5lh07CyRcj7U+vRN6dc3ww1cYRPLiVToa8xN5MBjPXHm bYIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w2NaCjbBDiQGc9B3pS2XLjC72qctmFrNuT1yGCXH9VI=; b=VojHWfJ4vYUCceB8Jr7DHZtBJqK26Qj7DxaMO7AvEOBEbmnOpgx/WppuhnB/PDjn9t q+VvwqbMNwtN8aDJSldKcY6VVkPe0bGZ1tKdlO4vhBbKppsZgDkpTrZU6tO8uejI5pAm pfdi0T36RLh2c9eOVEvSQtkG0ZjHqA+DBwJypCoinWg4geoejk+DltEvqoSy280rBOWj qOwTN2oKB1fRtiY9IkmEdnBQE3gI3p1SfihqrRuhD8GgVHA5sKkjNf18VRUcHvTfK9i+ YUdEuGvcQ+KJLZPcv8bEL3ANoUehPQXZ2sTXku+eGc75fXlV/N47yDVB03iVdgqV8ziT gXpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315CHHAV8yDstvfQjkafFam4tpaAFoPDk1UBNhNF91X4a0EB4wm ODNHUHyjNBs6DBLzwN0HTrH1UU3pOjE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxW6ahNOOYZmtYW3co4HpYch0LScKdIASVsW4DWyNVC4JyCo+Fz4lCXuK+qT2KBJ1MGNVt6Pg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:848b:: with SMTP id u11mr10096230pfn.72.1595618592392; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.182] ([66.219.217.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l23sm6386749pjy.45.2020.07.24.12.23.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] two 5.8 fixes To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org References: From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <2aa2d8ad-b532-e4ab-5e5b-a9f112b62474@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:23:10 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: io-uring-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 7/24/20 11:07 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > [2/2] is actually fixed in 5.9, but apparently it wasn't just a > speculation but rather an actual issue. It fixes locally, by moving > put out of lock, because don't see a reason why it's there. Thanks, I applied with the fixed spelling, and shuffled things around a bit. -- Jens Axboe