From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: asml.silence@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/5] io_uring/bpf-ops: implement loop_step with BPF struct_ops
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:32:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bd493f5b24df63f19499f0d65e5349c440e5d9c.1770818588.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1770818588.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Introduce io_uring BPF struct ops implementing the loop_step callback,
which will allow BPF to overwrite the default io_uring event loop logic.
The callback takes an io_uring context, the main role of which is to be
passed to io_uring kfuncs. The other argument is a struct iou_loop_params,
which BPF can use to request CQ waiting and communicate other parameters.
See the event loop description in the previous patch for more details.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
io_uring/Kconfig | 5 ++
io_uring/Makefile | 1 +
io_uring/bpf-ops.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
io_uring/bpf-ops.h | 14 +++++
io_uring/io_uring.c | 1 +
5 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 io_uring/bpf-ops.c
create mode 100644 io_uring/bpf-ops.h
diff --git a/io_uring/Kconfig b/io_uring/Kconfig
index a7ae23cf1035..a283d9e53787 100644
--- a/io_uring/Kconfig
+++ b/io_uring/Kconfig
@@ -14,3 +14,8 @@ config IO_URING_BPF
def_bool y
depends on BPF
depends on NET
+
+config IO_URING_BPF_OPS
+ def_bool y
+ depends on IO_URING
+ depends on BPF_SYSCALL && BPF_JIT && DEBUG_INFO_BTF
diff --git a/io_uring/Makefile b/io_uring/Makefile
index 1c1f47de32a4..c54e328d1410 100644
--- a/io_uring/Makefile
+++ b/io_uring/Makefile
@@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET) += net.o cmd_net.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += fdinfo.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IO_URING_MOCK_FILE) += mock_file.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IO_URING_BPF) += bpf_filter.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_IO_URING_BPF_OPS) += bpf-ops.o
diff --git a/io_uring/bpf-ops.c b/io_uring/bpf-ops.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7db07eda5a48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/io_uring/bpf-ops.c
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
+
+#include "io_uring.h"
+#include "register.h"
+#include "bpf-ops.h"
+#include "loop.h"
+
+static const struct btf_type *loop_params_type;
+
+static int io_bpf_ops__loop_step(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+ struct iou_loop_params *lp)
+{
+ return IOU_LOOP_STOP;
+}
+
+static struct io_uring_bpf_ops io_bpf_ops_stubs = {
+ .loop_step = io_bpf_ops__loop_step,
+};
+
+static bool bpf_io_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
+ enum bpf_access_type type,
+ const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
+{
+ if (type != BPF_READ)
+ return false;
+ if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(__u64) * MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
+ return false;
+ if (off % size != 0)
+ return false;
+
+ return btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
+}
+
+static int bpf_io_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
+ const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int off,
+ int size)
+{
+ const struct btf_type *t = btf_type_by_id(reg->btf, reg->btf_id);
+
+ if (t == loop_params_type) {
+ if (off >= offsetof(struct iou_loop_params, cq_wait_idx) &&
+ off + size <= offsetofend(struct iou_loop_params, cq_wait_idx))
+ return SCALAR_VALUE;
+ }
+
+ return -EACCES;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_io_verifier_ops = {
+ .get_func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto,
+ .is_valid_access = bpf_io_is_valid_access,
+ .btf_struct_access = bpf_io_btf_struct_access,
+};
+
+static const struct btf_type *
+io_lookup_struct_type(struct btf *btf, const char *name)
+{
+ s32 type_id;
+
+ type_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+ if (type_id < 0)
+ return NULL;
+ return btf_type_by_id(btf, type_id);
+}
+
+static int bpf_io_init(struct btf *btf)
+{
+ loop_params_type = io_lookup_struct_type(btf, "iou_loop_params");
+ if (!loop_params_type) {
+ pr_err("io_uring: Failed to locate iou_loop_params\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_io_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+ const struct btf_member *member,
+ const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_io_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+ const struct btf_member *member,
+ void *kdata, const void *udata)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_io_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static void bpf_io_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+}
+
+static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_ring_ops = {
+ .verifier_ops = &bpf_io_verifier_ops,
+ .reg = bpf_io_reg,
+ .unreg = bpf_io_unreg,
+ .check_member = bpf_io_check_member,
+ .init_member = bpf_io_init_member,
+ .init = bpf_io_init,
+ .cfi_stubs = &io_bpf_ops_stubs,
+ .name = "io_uring_bpf_ops",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int __init io_uring_bpf_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_ring_ops, io_uring_bpf_ops);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("io_uring: Failed to register struct_ops (%d)\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+__initcall(io_uring_bpf_init);
diff --git a/io_uring/bpf-ops.h b/io_uring/bpf-ops.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e8a08ae2df0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/io_uring/bpf-ops.h
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#ifndef IOU_BPF_OPS_H
+#define IOU_BPF_OPS_H
+
+#include <linux/io_uring_types.h>
+
+struct io_uring_bpf_ops {
+ int (*loop_step)(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct iou_loop_params *lp);
+
+ __u32 ring_fd;
+ void *priv;
+};
+
+#endif /* IOU_BPF_OPS_H */
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 52f9a5c766c1..1f7c03728083 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@
#include "msg_ring.h"
#include "memmap.h"
#include "zcrx.h"
+#include "bpf-ops.h"
#include "timeout.h"
#include "poll.h"
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-11 14:32 [PATCH io_uring-7.1 v5 0/5] BPF controlled io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-11 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] io_uring: introduce callback driven main loop Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-11 14:32 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2026-02-11 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] io_uring/bpf-ops: add kfunc helpers Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-11 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] io_uring/bpf-ops: implement bpf ops registration Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-11 15:21 ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-11 15:40 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-11 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] selftests/io_uring: add a bpf io_uring selftest Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-11 15:22 ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-11 15:24 ` [PATCH io_uring-7.1 v5 0/5] BPF controlled io_uring Jens Axboe
2026-02-11 18:58 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2bd493f5b24df63f19499f0d65e5349c440e5d9c.1770818588.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox