public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] io_uring: make io_buffer_select() return the user address directly
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 06:28:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 5/9/22 6:12 AM, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-05-09 at 12:06 +0000, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
>> On Sun, 2022-05-01 at 14:56 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> There's no point in having callers provide a kbuf, we're just
>>> returning
>>> the address anyway.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/io_uring.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> @@ -6013,10 +6006,11 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req,
>>> unsigned int issue_flags)
>>>                 return -ENOTSOCK;
>>>  
>>>         if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECT) {
>>> -               kbuf = io_buffer_select(req, &sr->len, sr->bgid,
>>> issue_flags);
>>> -               if (IS_ERR(kbuf))
>>> -                       return PTR_ERR(kbuf);
>>> -               buf = u64_to_user_ptr(kbuf->addr);
>>> +               void __user *buf;
>>
>> this now shadows the outer buf, and so does not work at all as the buf
>> value is lost.
>> A bit surprised this did not show up in any tests.
>>
>>> +
>>> +               buf = io_buffer_select(req, &sr->len, sr->bgid,
>>> issue_flags);
>>> +               if (IS_ERR(buf))
>>> +                       return PTR_ERR(buf);
>>>         }
>>>  
>>>         ret = import_single_range(READ, buf, sr->len, &iov,
>>> &msg.msg_iter);
>>
> 
> The following seems to fix it for me. I can submit it separately if you
> like.

I think you want something like this:


diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 19dd3ba92486..2b87c89d2375 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5599,7 +5599,6 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 {
 	struct io_sr_msg *sr = &req->sr_msg;
 	struct msghdr msg;
-	void __user *buf = sr->buf;
 	struct socket *sock;
 	struct iovec iov;
 	unsigned flags;
@@ -5620,9 +5619,10 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 		buf = io_buffer_select(req, &sr->len, sr->bgid, issue_flags);
 		if (IS_ERR(buf))
 			return PTR_ERR(buf);
+		sr->buf = buf;
 	}
 
-	ret = import_single_range(READ, buf, sr->len, &iov, &msg.msg_iter);
+	ret = import_single_range(READ, sr->buf, sr->len, &iov, &msg.msg_iter);
 	if (unlikely(ret))
 		goto out_free;
 

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-09 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-01 20:56 [PATCHSET v4 0/16] Add support for ring mapped provided buffers Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 01/16] io_uring: kill io_recv_buffer_select() wrapper Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 02/16] io_uring: use 'sr' vs 'req->sr_msg' consistently Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 03/16] io_uring: make io_buffer_select() return the user address directly Jens Axboe
2022-05-09 12:06   ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-05-09 12:12     ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-05-09 12:28       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-05-09 12:43         ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-05-09 12:46           ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-09 12:21     ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 04/16] io_uring: kill io_rw_buffer_select() wrapper Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 05/16] io_uring: ignore ->buf_index if REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECT isn't set Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 06/16] io_uring: always use req->buf_index for the provided buffer group Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 07/16] io_uring: get rid of hashed provided buffer groups Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 08/16] io_uring: never call io_buffer_select() for a buffer re-select Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 09/16] io_uring: abstract out provided buffer list selection Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 10/16] io_uring: move provided and fixed buffers into the same io_kiocb area Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 11/16] io_uring: move provided buffer state closer to submit state Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 12/16] io_uring: eliminate the need to track provided buffer ID separately Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 13/16] io_uring: don't clear req->kbuf when buffer selection is done Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 14/16] io_uring: add buffer selection support to IORING_OP_NOP Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 15/16] io_uring: add io_pin_pages() helper Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 16/16] io_uring: add support for ring mapped supplied buffers Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox