public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Yejune Deng <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: simplify io_remove_personalities()
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 19:25:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 24/12/2020 03:02, Yejune Deng wrote:
> The function io_remove_personalities() is very similar to
> io_unregister_personality(),so implement io_remove_personalities()
> calling io_unregister_personality().

Please, don't forget to specify a version in the subject, e.g.
[PATCH v2], add a changelog after "---" and add tags from previous
threads if any.

Looks good
Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yejune Deng <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/io_uring.c | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index b749578..dc913fa 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -8608,9 +8608,8 @@ static int io_uring_fasync(int fd, struct file *file, int on)
>  	return fasync_helper(fd, file, on, &ctx->cq_fasync);
>  }
>  
> -static int io_remove_personalities(int id, void *p, void *data)
> +static int io_unregister_personality(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned id)
>  {
> -	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = data;
>  	struct io_identity *iod;
>  
>  	iod = idr_remove(&ctx->personality_idr, id);
> @@ -8618,7 +8617,17 @@ static int io_remove_personalities(int id, void *p, void *data)
>  		put_cred(iod->creds);
>  		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&iod->count))
>  			kfree(iod);
> +		return 0;
>  	}
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int io_remove_personalities(int id, void *p, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = data;
> +
> +	io_unregister_personality(ctx, id);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -9679,21 +9688,6 @@ static int io_register_personality(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int io_unregister_personality(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned id)
> -{
> -	struct io_identity *iod;
> -
> -	iod = idr_remove(&ctx->personality_idr, id);
> -	if (iod) {
> -		put_cred(iod->creds);
> -		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&iod->count))
> -			kfree(iod);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
> -	return -EINVAL;
> -}
> -
>  static int io_register_restrictions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
>  				    unsigned int nr_args)
>  {
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-02 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-24  3:02 [PATCH] io_uring: simplify io_remove_personalities() Yejune Deng
2021-01-02 19:25 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-01-20  2:26   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-20  3:10 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox