* [PATCH for-5.15] io-wq: move nr_running and worker_refs out of wqe->lock protection
@ 2021-08-10 12:55 Hao Xu
2021-08-18 9:22 ` Hao Xu
2021-08-18 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hao Xu @ 2021-08-10 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: io-uring, Pavel Begunkov, Joseph Qi
We don't need to protect nr_running and worker_refs by wqe->lock, so
narrow the range of raw_spin_lock_irq - raw_spin_unlock_irq
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---
fs/io-wq.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 4ce83bb48021..8da9bb103916 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -256,16 +256,17 @@ static void io_wqe_wake_worker(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wqe_acct *acct)
raw_spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
if (acct->nr_workers < acct->max_workers) {
- atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
- atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
if (!acct->nr_workers)
first = true;
acct->nr_workers++;
do_create = true;
}
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
- if (do_create)
+ if (do_create) {
+ atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
+ atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
create_io_worker(wqe->wq, wqe, acct->index, first);
+ }
}
}
--
2.24.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH for-5.15] io-wq: move nr_running and worker_refs out of wqe->lock protection
2021-08-10 12:55 [PATCH for-5.15] io-wq: move nr_running and worker_refs out of wqe->lock protection Hao Xu
@ 2021-08-18 9:22 ` Hao Xu
2021-08-18 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hao Xu @ 2021-08-18 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: io-uring, Pavel Begunkov, Joseph Qi
在 2021/8/10 下午8:55, Hao Xu 写道:
ping
> We don't need to protect nr_running and worker_refs by wqe->lock, so
> narrow the range of raw_spin_lock_irq - raw_spin_unlock_irq
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/io-wq.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
> index 4ce83bb48021..8da9bb103916 100644
> --- a/fs/io-wq.c
> +++ b/fs/io-wq.c
> @@ -256,16 +256,17 @@ static void io_wqe_wake_worker(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wqe_acct *acct)
>
> raw_spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
> if (acct->nr_workers < acct->max_workers) {
> - atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
> - atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
> if (!acct->nr_workers)
> first = true;
> acct->nr_workers++;
> do_create = true;
> }
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
> - if (do_create)
> + if (do_create) {
> + atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
> + atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
> create_io_worker(wqe->wq, wqe, acct->index, first);
> + }
> }
> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH for-5.15] io-wq: move nr_running and worker_refs out of wqe->lock protection
2021-08-10 12:55 [PATCH for-5.15] io-wq: move nr_running and worker_refs out of wqe->lock protection Hao Xu
2021-08-18 9:22 ` Hao Xu
@ 2021-08-18 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2021-08-18 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hao Xu; +Cc: io-uring, Pavel Begunkov, Joseph Qi
On 8/10/21 6:55 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
> We don't need to protect nr_running and worker_refs by wqe->lock, so
> narrow the range of raw_spin_lock_irq - raw_spin_unlock_irq
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-18 13:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-10 12:55 [PATCH for-5.15] io-wq: move nr_running and worker_refs out of wqe->lock protection Hao Xu
2021-08-18 9:22 ` Hao Xu
2021-08-18 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox