public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>,
	Linux API Mailing List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: IORING_REGISTER_CREDS[_UPDATE]() and credfd_create()?
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:09:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Am 29.01.20 um 18:42 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On 1/29/20 10:34 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/29/20 7:23 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>>>> The override_creds(personality_creds) has changed current->cred
>>>>>> and get_current_cred() will just pick it up as in the default case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This would make the patch much simpler and allows put_cred() to be
>>>>>> in io_put_work() instead of __io_req_aux_free() as explained above.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's one extra get_current_cred(). I'd prefer to find another way to
>>>>> clean this up.
>>>>
>>>> As far as I can see it avoids a get_cred() in the IOSQE_PERSONALITY case
>>>> and the if (!req->work.creds) for both cases.
>>>
>>> Great, that you turned attention to that! override_creds() is already
>>> grabbing a ref, so it shouldn't call get_cred() there.
>>> So, that's a bug.
>>
>> It's not though - one is dropped in that function, the other when the
>> request is freed. So we do need two references to it. With the proposed
>> change to keep the override_creds() variable local for that spot we
>> don't, and the get_cred() can then go.
>>
>>> It could be I'm wrong with the statement above, need to recheck all this
>>> code to be sure.
>>
>> I think you are :-)
>>
>>> BTW, io_req_defer_prep() may be called twice for a req, so you will
>>> reassign it without putting a ref. It's safer to leave NULL checks. At
>>> least, until I've done reworking and fixing preparation paths.
>>
>> Agree, the NULL checks are safer and we should keep them.
>>
>> Going through the rest of this thread, I'm making the following changes:
>>
>> - ID must be > 0. I like that change, as we don't need an sqe flag to
>>   select personality then, and it also makes it obvious that id == 0 is
>>   just using current creds.
>>
>> - Fixed the missing put_cred() in the teardown
>>
>> - Use a local variable in io_submit_sqe() instead of assigning the
>>   creds to req->work.creds there
>>
>> - Use cyclic idr allocation
>>
>> I'm going to fold in as appropriate. If there are fixes needed on top of
>> that, let's do them separately.
> 
> In particular, would love a patch that only assigns req->work.creds if
> we do go async, so we can leave the put_cred() in io_put_work()
> instead of needing it in __io_req_aux_free().

I made some improvements here:

https://git.samba.org/?p=metze/linux/wip.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-5.6/io_uring-vfs

Feel free to squash
https://git.samba.org/?p=metze/linux/wip.git;a=commitdiff;h=ce8812c9b935467bb08ed4d528dd92b9f67e221c
into
https://git.samba.org/?p=metze/linux/wip.git;a=commitdiff;h=22021e95e73d4658a6c834a3276886e127ab8425
and add my review to it.

If you're confident that it's safe you can
call io_req_work_drop_env() also in io_put_work(),

metze





  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-29 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-28 10:18 IORING_REGISTER_CREDS[_UPDATE]() and credfd_create()? Stefan Metzmacher
2020-01-28 16:10 ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-28 16:17   ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-01-28 16:19     ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-28 17:19       ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-28 18:04         ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-28 19:42           ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-28 20:16             ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-28 20:19               ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-28 20:50                 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-28 20:56                   ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-28 21:25                     ` Christian Brauner
2020-01-28 22:38                       ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-28 23:36             ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-28 23:40               ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-28 23:51                 ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-29  0:10                   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-29  0:15                     ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-29  0:18                       ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-29  0:20                     ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-29  0:21                       ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-29  0:24                         ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-29  0:54                           ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-29 10:17                             ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-29 13:11                               ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-01-29 13:41                                 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-29 13:56                                   ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-01-29 14:23                                     ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-29 14:27                                       ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-01-29 14:34                                         ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-29 17:34                                       ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-29 17:42                                         ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-29 20:09                                           ` Stefan Metzmacher [this message]
2020-01-29 20:48                                             ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-29 17:46                                         ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-29 14:59             ` Jann Horn
2020-01-29 17:34               ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-30  1:08                 ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-30  2:20                   ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-30  3:18                     ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-30  6:53                   ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-01-30 10:11                   ` Jann Horn
2020-01-30 10:26                     ` Christian Brauner
2020-01-30 14:11                       ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-30 14:47                         ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-01-30 15:34                           ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-30 15:13                         ` Christian Brauner
2020-01-30 15:29                           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox