From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: francis <francis@brosseau.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/poll: fix multishot recv missing EOF on wakeup race
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 14:17:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e2d6e81-bf95-47bf-9c70-1b2f8b63cfbc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8688cc4e-8619-4392-8d5c-93c554d70c34@kernel.dk>
On 3/15/26 16:19, Jens Axboe wrote:
> When a socket send and shutdown() happen back-to-back, both fire
> wake-ups before the receiver's task_work has a chance to run. The first
> wake gets poll ownership (poll_refs=1), and the second bumps it to 2.
> When io_poll_check_events() runs, it calls io_poll_issue() which does a
> recv that reads the data and returns IOU_RETRY. The loop then drains all
> accumulated refs (atomic_sub_return(2) -> 0) and exits, even though only
> the first event was consumed. Since the shutdown is a persistent state
> change, no further wakeups will happen, and the multishot recv can hang
> forever.
>
> Fix this by only draining a single poll ref after io_poll_issue()
> returns IOU_RETRY for the APOLL_MULTISHOT path. If additional wakes
> raced in (poll_refs was > 1), the loop iterates again, vfs_poll()
> discovers the remaining state.
How often will iterate with no effect for normal execution (i.e.
no shutdown)? And how costly it'll be? Why not handle HUP instead?
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-15 16:19 [PATCH] io_uring/poll: fix multishot recv missing EOF on wakeup race Jens Axboe
2026-03-16 14:17 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2026-03-16 14:28 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-16 14:40 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-03-16 14:44 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-03-16 15:16 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-16 18:40 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-16 22:24 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-03-16 22:31 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-16 23:08 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-03-17 1:14 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-17 1:36 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e2d6e81-bf95-47bf-9c70-1b2f8b63cfbc@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=francis@brosseau.dev \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox