From: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>
To: "David Laight" <[email protected]>,
"André Almeida" <[email protected]>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <[email protected]>,
"Ingo Molnar" <[email protected]>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <[email protected]>,
"Darren Hart" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"Steven Rostedt" <[email protected]>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]"
<[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] Add futex2 syscall
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:55:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Am 08.03.21 um 12:11 schrieb David Laight:
> From: Stefan Metzmacher
>> Sent: 07 March 2021 11:35
>>
>> Hi André,
>>> ** The wait on multiple problem
>>>
>>> The use case lies in the Wine implementation of the Windows NT interface
>>> WaitMultipleObjects. This Windows API function allows a thread to sleep
>>> waiting on the first of a set of event sources (mutexes, timers, signal,
>>> console input, etc) to signal.
>
> They are all events.
> You can only wait on either events or sockets (using select).
> There is a socket api to signal an event when data arrives (etc).
> There is also the insane (these days) restriction of 64 events.
Ok.
>> With that in mind would it be good to have some interaction with epoll (and similar calls)?
>
> Or hook something up so that pollwakeup can kick a futex as well
> as waking up poll() and adding an event to epoll().
I guess as FUTEX_FD was already there and was removed we can stop this discussion.
If there will every be the need to an async call, I guess a io_uring based one would
be the best...
metze
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <[email protected]>
2021-03-07 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] Add futex2 syscall Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-07 11:56 ` Daurnimator
2021-03-08 11:52 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-08 11:11 ` David Laight
2021-03-08 11:55 ` Stefan Metzmacher [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox