From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>, Clay Harris <[email protected]>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] iomap: merge iomap_seek_hole() and iomap_seek_data()
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 20:10:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZMGVM/[email protected]>
On 7/27/23 05:50, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:25:57PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
>> From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>>
>> The two functions share almost same code, merge them together.
>> No functional change in this patch.
>
> No, please don't. seek data and seek hole have subtly different
> semantics and return values, and we've explicitly kept them separate
> because it's much easier to maintain them as separate functions with
> separate semantics than combine them into a single function with
> lots of non-obvious conditional behaviour.
>
> The fact that the new iomap_seek() API requires a boolean "SEEK_DATA
> or SEEK_HOLE" field to indicate that the caller wants makes it clear
> that this isn't actually an improvement over explicit
> iomap_seek_data() and iomap_seek_hole() API calls.
>
> -Dave.
I'll revert it back in next version. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-27 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-26 10:25 [RFC 0/7] io_uring lseek Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] iomap: merge iomap_seek_hole() and iomap_seek_data() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 21:50 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-27 12:10 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: add nowait support for xfs_seek_iomap_begin() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 21:55 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-26 22:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-27 12:17 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] add nowait parameter for iomap_seek() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] add llseek_nowait() for struct file_operations Hao Xu
2023-07-27 13:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] add llseek_nowait support for xfs Hao Xu
2023-07-26 22:14 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-27 12:26 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] add vfs_lseek_nowait() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] add lseek for io_uring Hao Xu
2023-07-26 13:22 ` [RFC 0/7] io_uring lseek Christian Brauner
2023-07-27 12:30 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox