From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Glauber Costa <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 liburing] add helper functions to verify io_uring functionality
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 09:31:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD-J=zZURZV46Tzx4fC4EteD4ejL=axKaw-CjtyFmYhCYzKEdg@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/30/20 9:29 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:13 AM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/30/20 9:00 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>> It is common for an application using an ever-evolving interface to want
>>> to inquire about the presence of certain functionality it plans to use.
>>>
>>> Information about opcodes is stored in a io_uring_probe structure. There
>>> is usually some boilerplate involved in initializing one, and then using
>>> it to check if it is enabled.
>>>
>>> This patch adds two new helper functions: one that returns a pointer to
>>> a io_uring_probe (or null if it probe is not available), and another one
>>> that given a probe checks if the opcode is supported.
>>
>> This looks good, I committed it with minor changes.
>>
>> On top of this, we should have a helper that doesn't need a ring. So
>> basically one that just sets up a ring, calls io_uring_get_probe(),
>> then tears down the ring.
>>
> I'd be happy to follow up with that.
>
> Just to be sure, the information returned by probe should be able to outlive the
> tear down of the ring, right ?
Yeah, same lifetime as the helper you have now, caller must free it once
done.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-30 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-30 16:00 [PATCH v2 liburing] add helper functions to verify io_uring functionality Glauber Costa
2020-01-30 16:13 ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-30 16:29 ` Glauber Costa
2020-01-30 16:31 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-01-31 13:52 ` Glauber Costa
2020-01-31 15:14 ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-31 15:27 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox