From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Yejune Deng <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: simplify io_remove_personalities()
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 02:26:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 02/01/2021 19:25, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 24/12/2020 03:02, Yejune Deng wrote:
>> The function io_remove_personalities() is very similar to
>> io_unregister_personality(),so implement io_remove_personalities()
>> calling io_unregister_personality().
>
> Please, don't forget to specify a version in the subject, e.g.
> [PATCH v2], add a changelog after "---" and add tags from previous
> threads if any.
>
> Looks good
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
up
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yejune Deng <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/io_uring.c | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index b749578..dc913fa 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -8608,9 +8608,8 @@ static int io_uring_fasync(int fd, struct file *file, int on)
>> return fasync_helper(fd, file, on, &ctx->cq_fasync);
>> }
>>
>> -static int io_remove_personalities(int id, void *p, void *data)
>> +static int io_unregister_personality(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned id)
>> {
>> - struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = data;
>> struct io_identity *iod;
>>
>> iod = idr_remove(&ctx->personality_idr, id);
>> @@ -8618,7 +8617,17 @@ static int io_remove_personalities(int id, void *p, void *data)
>> put_cred(iod->creds);
>> if (refcount_dec_and_test(&iod->count))
>> kfree(iod);
>> + return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int io_remove_personalities(int id, void *p, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = data;
>> +
>> + io_unregister_personality(ctx, id);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -9679,21 +9688,6 @@ static int io_register_personality(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static int io_unregister_personality(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned id)
>> -{
>> - struct io_identity *iod;
>> -
>> - iod = idr_remove(&ctx->personality_idr, id);
>> - if (iod) {
>> - put_cred(iod->creds);
>> - if (refcount_dec_and_test(&iod->count))
>> - kfree(iod);
>> - return 0;
>> - }
>> -
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> -}
>> -
>> static int io_register_restrictions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
>> unsigned int nr_args)
>> {
>>
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-24 3:02 [PATCH] io_uring: simplify io_remove_personalities() Yejune Deng
2021-01-02 19:25 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-20 2:26 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-01-20 3:10 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox