From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>, Clay Harris <[email protected]>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] add llseek_nowait support for xfs
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 20:26:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 7/27/23 06:14, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:26:01PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
>> From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>>
>> Add llseek_nowait() operation for xfs, it acts just like llseek(). The
>> thing different is it delivers nowait parameter to iomap layer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> index 73adc0aee2ff..cba82264221d 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> @@ -1257,10 +1257,11 @@ xfs_file_readdir(
>> }
>>
>> STATIC loff_t
>> -xfs_file_llseek(
>> +__xfs_file_llseek(
>> struct file *file,
>> loff_t offset,
>> - int whence)
>> + int whence,
>> + bool nowait)
>> {
>> struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
>>
>> @@ -1282,6 +1283,28 @@ xfs_file_llseek(
>> return vfs_setpos(file, offset, inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes);
>> }
>>
>> +STATIC loff_t
>> +xfs_file_llseek(
>> + struct file *file,
>> + loff_t offset,
>> + int whence)
>> +{
>> + return __xfs_file_llseek(file, offset, whence, false);
>> +}
>> +
>> +STATIC loff_t
>> +xfs_file_llseek_nowait(
>> + struct file *file,
>> + loff_t offset,
>> + int whence,
>> + bool nowait)
>> +{
>> + if (file->f_op == &xfs_file_operations)
>> + return __xfs_file_llseek(file, offset, whence, nowait);
>> + else
>> + return generic_file_llseek(file, offset, whence);
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX
>> static inline vm_fault_t
>> xfs_dax_fault(
>> @@ -1442,6 +1465,7 @@ xfs_file_mmap(
>>
>> const struct file_operations xfs_file_operations = {
>> .llseek = xfs_file_llseek,
>> + .llseek_nowait = xfs_file_llseek_nowait,
>> .read_iter = xfs_file_read_iter,
>> .write_iter = xfs_file_write_iter,
>> .splice_read = xfs_file_splice_read,
>> @@ -1467,6 +1491,7 @@ const struct file_operations xfs_dir_file_operations = {
>> .read = generic_read_dir,
>> .iterate_shared = xfs_file_readdir,
>> .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
>> + .llseek_nowait = xfs_file_llseek_nowait,
>> .unlocked_ioctl = xfs_file_ioctl,
>> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> .compat_ioctl = xfs_file_compat_ioctl,
>
> This is pretty nasty. It would be far better just to change the
> .llseek method than to inflict this on every filesystem for the
> forseeable future.
>
> Not that I'm a fan of passing "nowait" booleans all through the file
> operations methods - that way lies madness. We use a control
> structure for the IO path operations (kiocb) to hold per-call
> context information, perhaps we need something similar for these
> other methods that people are wanting to hook up to io_uring (e.g.
> readdir) so taht we don't have to play whack-a-mole with every new
> io_uring method that people want and then end up with a different
> nowait solution for every method.
>
> -Dave.
whack-a-mole is exactly what I thought when I tried to find a place to
hold that...I'll think about it in next version, a generic structure for
io_uring is good I believe. I'll update this patchset after the getdents
stuff are merged.
Thanks,
Hao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-27 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-26 10:25 [RFC 0/7] io_uring lseek Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] iomap: merge iomap_seek_hole() and iomap_seek_data() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 21:50 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-27 12:10 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: add nowait support for xfs_seek_iomap_begin() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 21:55 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-26 22:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-27 12:17 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] add nowait parameter for iomap_seek() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] add llseek_nowait() for struct file_operations Hao Xu
2023-07-27 13:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] add llseek_nowait support for xfs Hao Xu
2023-07-26 22:14 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-27 12:26 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] add vfs_lseek_nowait() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] add lseek for io_uring Hao Xu
2023-07-26 13:22 ` [RFC 0/7] io_uring lseek Christian Brauner
2023-07-27 12:30 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox