From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] io_uring: add xattr support
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 07:39:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211223110453.zbyah76jpc3ivjfp@wittgenstein>
On 12/23/21 4:04 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 01:01:22PM -0800, Stefan Roesch wrote:
>> This adds the xattr support to io_uring. The intent is to have a more
>> complete support for file operations in io_uring.
>>
>> This change adds support for the following functions to io_uring:
>> - fgetxattr
>> - fsetxattr
>> - getxattr
>> - setxattr
>>
>> Patch 1: fs: split off do_user_path_at_empty from user_path_at_empty()
>> This splits off a new function do_user_path_at_empty from
>> user_path_at_empty that is based on filename and not on a
>> user-specified string.
>>
>> Patch 2: fs: split off setxattr_setup function from setxattr
>> Split off the setup part of the setxattr function.
>>
>> Patch 3: fs: split off do_getxattr from getxattr
>> Split of the do_getxattr part from getxattr. This will
>> allow it to be invoked it from io_uring.
>>
>> Patch 4: io_uring: add fsetxattr and setxattr support
>> This adds new functions to support the fsetxattr and setxattr
>> functions.
>>
>> Patch 5: io_uring: add fgetxattr and getxattr support
>> This adds new functions to support the fgetxattr and getxattr
>> functions.
>>
>>
>> There are two additional patches:
>> liburing: Add support for xattr api's.
>> This also includes the tests for the new code.
>> xfstests: Add support for io_uring xattr support.
>>
>>
>> V6: - reverted addition of kname array to xattr_ctx structure
>> Adding the kname array increases the io_kiocb beyond 64 bytes
>> (increases it to 224 bytes). We try hard to limit it to 64 bytes.
>> Keeping the original interface also is a bit more efficient.
>> - rebased on for-5.17/io_uring-getdents64
>> V5: - add kname array to xattr_ctx structure
>> V4: - rebased patch series
>> V3: - remove req->file checks in prep functions
>> - change size parameter in do_xattr
>> V2: - split off function do_user_path_empty instead of changing
>> the function signature of user_path_at
>> - Fix datatype size problem in do_getxattr
>>
>>
>>
>> Stefan Roesch (5):
>> fs: split off do_user_path_at_empty from user_path_at_empty()
>> fs: split off setxattr_setup function from setxattr
>> fs: split off do_getxattr from getxattr
>> io_uring: add fsetxattr and setxattr support
>> io_uring: add fgetxattr and getxattr support
>>
>> fs/internal.h | 23 +++
>> fs/io_uring.c | 318 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> fs/namei.c | 10 +-
>> fs/xattr.c | 107 ++++++++----
>> include/linux/namei.h | 2 +
>> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 8 +-
>> 6 files changed, 428 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> base-commit: b4518682080d3a1cdd6ea45a54ff6772b8b2797a
>
> Jens, please keep me in the loop once this series lands.
You bet, and thanks for the reviews!
> I maintain a large vfs testsuite for idmapped mounts (It's actually a
> generic testsuite which also tests idmapped mounts.) and it currently
> already has tests for io_uring:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git/tree/src/idmapped-mounts/idmapped-mounts.c#n6942
>
> Once this lands we need to expand it to test xattr support for io_uring
> as well (It should probably also include mkdir/link/mknod that we added
> last cycle.).
There are a few basic tests here:
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/liburing/log/?h=xattr
as well, but more of a sanity kind of checking, would be great if tests
were added to the VFS suite as well.
With the last few kinks ironed out, I hope to queue the next version
posted for 5.17.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-23 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-22 21:01 [PATCH v6 0/5] io_uring: add xattr support Stefan Roesch
2021-12-22 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] fs: split off do_user_path_at_empty from user_path_at_empty() Stefan Roesch
2021-12-23 10:48 ` Christian Brauner
2021-12-22 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] fs: split off setxattr_setup function from setxattr Stefan Roesch
2021-12-23 10:24 ` Christian Brauner
2021-12-22 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] fs: split off do_getxattr from getxattr Stefan Roesch
2021-12-23 10:57 ` Christian Brauner
2021-12-22 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] io_uring: add fsetxattr and setxattr support Stefan Roesch
2021-12-23 14:52 ` Christian Brauner
2021-12-23 20:00 ` Stefan Roesch
2021-12-22 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] io_uring: add fgetxattr and getxattr support Stefan Roesch
2021-12-23 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] io_uring: add xattr support Christian Brauner
2021-12-23 14:39 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox