From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:43:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 31/05/2020 19:15, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> In the begin of __io_splice_prep or io_close_prep, current io_uring mainline codes will
> modify req->work.flags firstly, so we need to call io_req_init_async to initialize
> io_wq_work before the work.flags modification.
> For below codes:
> static inline void io_req_init_async(struct io_kiocb *req,
> void (*func)(struct io_wq_work **))
> {
> if (req->flags & REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED) {
> if (!req->work.func)
> req->work.func = func;
> } else {
> req->work = (struct io_wq_work){ .func = func };
> req->flags |= REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED;
> }
> }
>
> if we not pass NULL to parameter 'func', e.g. pass io_wq_submit_work, then
> we can not use io_req_init_async() to pass io_close_finish again.
It's not as bad, just the thing you poked is overused and don't have strict rules.
I have a feeling, that for it to be done right it'd need more fundamental refactoring
with putting everything related to ->work closer to io_queue_async_work().
>
> Now I'm confused how to write better codes based on current io_uring mainline codes :)
> If you have some free time, please have a deeper look, thanks.
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-30 14:39 [PATCH v4 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-30 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] io_uring: avoid unnecessary io_wq_work copy for fast poll feature Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-30 16:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline Jens Axboe
2020-05-30 17:14 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-30 17:29 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-30 17:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-31 13:57 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-31 14:49 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-31 14:12 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-31 14:31 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-31 14:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-31 16:15 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-01 10:43 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-06-01 11:50 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-01 4:56 ` [PATCH v5 " Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-01 4:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] io_uring: avoid unnecessary io_wq_work copy for fast poll feature Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-02 1:16 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-03 13:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-07 15:02 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-07 20:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-07 20:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-07 23:29 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-08 7:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-08 12:14 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-08 20:08 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-07 23:26 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-31 14:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox