* [PATCH] io_uring/sqpoll: use the correct check for pending task_work
@ 2024-02-14 20:59 Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2024-02-14 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring
A previous commit moved to using just the private task_work list for
SQPOLL, but it neglected to update the check for whether we have
pending task_work. Normally this is fine as we'll attempt to run it
unconditionally, but if we race with going to sleep AND task_work
being added, then we certainly need the right check here.
Fixes: af5d68f8892f ("io_uring/sqpoll: manage task_work privately")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/io_uring/sqpoll.c b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
index f3979cacda13..82672eaaee81 100644
--- a/io_uring/sqpoll.c
+++ b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
@@ -246,6 +246,13 @@ static unsigned int io_sq_tw(struct llist_node **retry_list, int max_entries)
return count;
}
+static bool io_sq_tw_pending(struct llist_node *retry_list)
+{
+ struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring;
+
+ return retry_list || !llist_empty(&tctx->task_list);
+}
+
static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
{
struct llist_node *retry_list = NULL;
@@ -301,7 +308,7 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
}
prepare_to_wait(&sqd->wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- if (!io_sqd_events_pending(sqd) && !task_work_pending(current)) {
+ if (!io_sqd_events_pending(sqd) && !io_sq_tw_pending(retry_list)) {
bool needs_sched = true;
list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) {
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-02-14 20:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-14 20:59 [PATCH] io_uring/sqpoll: use the correct check for pending task_work Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox