public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <[email protected]>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <[email protected]>,
	Keith Busch <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>, Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Xinyu Zhang <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] nvme_map_user_request() cleanup
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:27:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 3/24/25 13:05, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> The first commit removes a WARN_ON_ONCE() checking userspace values.
> The last 2 move code out of nvme_map_user_request() that belongs better
> in its callers, and move the fixed buffer import before going async.
> As discussed in [1], this allows an NVMe passthru operation submitted at
> the same time as a ublk zero-copy buffer unregister operation to succeed
> even if the initial issue goes async. This can improve performance of
> userspace applications submitting the operations together like this with
> a slow fallback path on failure. This is an alternate approach to [2],
> which moved the fixed buffer import to the io_uring layer.
>
> There will likely be conflicts with the parameter cleanup series Keith
> posted last month in [3].
>
> The series is based on block/for-6.15/io_uring, with commit 00817f0f1c45
> ("nvme-ioctl: fix leaked requests on mapping error") cherry-picked.
>
> [1]:https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]/T/#u
> [2]:https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]/
> [3]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/#u
>
> v3: Move the fixed buffer import before allocating a blk-mq request
>
> v2: Fix iov_iter value passed to nvme_map_user_request()

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <[email protected]>

-ck



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-25 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-24 20:05 [PATCH v3 0/3] nvme_map_user_request() cleanup Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-03-24 20:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] nvme/ioctl: don't warn on vectorized uring_cmd with fixed buffer Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-03-25 12:50   ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-24 20:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme/ioctl: move blk_mq_free_request() out of nvme_map_user_request() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-03-25 12:52   ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-24 20:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] nvme/ioctl: move fixed buffer lookup to nvme_uring_cmd_io() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-03-25 12:52   ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-25 17:27 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2025-03-26  3:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] nvme_map_user_request() cleanup Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox