From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring: enable toggle of iowait usage when waiting on CQEs
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 08:07:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 3/16/25 12:57 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 3/14/25 18:48, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> By default, io_uring marks a waiting task as being in iowait, if it's
>> sleeping waiting on events and there are pending requests. This isn't
>> necessarily always useful, and may be confusing on non-storage setups
>> where iowait isn't expected. It can also cause extra power usage, by
>
> I think this passage hints on controlling iowait stats, and in my opinion
> we shouldn't conflate stats and optimisations. Global iowait stats
> is there to stay, but ideally we want to never account io_uring as iowait.
> That's while there were talks about removing optimisation toggle at all
> (and do it as internal cpufreq magic, I suppose).
>
> How about posing it as an optimisation option only and that iowait stat
> is a side effect that can change. Explicitly spelling that in the commit
> message and in a comment on top of the flag in an attempt to avoid the
> uapi regression trap. We'd also need it in the option's man when it's
> written. And I'd also add "hint" to the flag name, like
> IORING_ENTER_HINT_NO_IOWAIT, as we might need to nop it if anything
> changes on the cpufreq side.
Having potentially the control of both would be useful, the stat
accounting and the cpufreq boosting. I do think the current name is
better, though, the hint doesn't really add anything. I think we'd want
to have it be clear on one controlling accounting only. Maybe adding
both flagts now would be the better choice, except you'd get -EINVAL if
you set IORING_ENTER_IOWAIT_BOOST. And then you'd need two FEAT flags,
which is pretty damn wasteful.
Hmm...
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-17 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-14 18:48 [PATCH v2] io_uring: enable toggle of iowait usage when waiting on CQEs Jens Axboe
2025-03-16 6:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-03-17 14:07 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-03-18 6:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-03-18 18:36 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-18 20:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox