public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>,
	io-uring <[email protected]>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>,
	Al Viro <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] io-wq: fork worker threads from original task
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 13:54:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiDYfkuH1cAk_oZDZ8ZzZP1zuaXcQv34P5z_JJi038fZQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/4/21 1:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:54 AM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I agree, here are the two current patches. Just need to add the signal
>> blocking, which I'd love to do in create_io_thread(), but seems to
>> require either an allocation or provide a helper to do it in the thread
>> itself (with an on-stack mask).
> 
> Hmm. Why do you set SIGCHLD in create_io_thread()? Do you actually use
> it? Shouldn't IO thread exit be a silent thing?

Good catch, I will drop that.

> And why do you have those task_thread_bound() and
> task_thread_unbound() functions? As far as I can tell, you have those
> two functions just to set the process worker flags.

Already dropped that, it's not in the current set.

> Why don't you just do that now inside create_io_worker(), and the
> whole task_thread_[un]bound() thing goes away, and you just always
> start the IO thread in task_thread() itself?

That's exactly what I did:

https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=io_uring-5.12&id=dda3b920327093a2bb8c2e5db26db9203d7f60e6

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-19 17:09 [PATCHSET RFC 0/18] Remove kthread usage from io_uring Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/18] io_uring: remove the need for relying on an io-wq fallback worker Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 20:25   ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-02-19 20:37     ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-22 13:46   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/18] io-wq: don't create any IO workers upfront Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 03/18] io_uring: disable io-wq attaching Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/18] io-wq: get rid of wq->use_refs Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/18] io_uring: tie async worker side to the task context Jens Axboe
2021-02-20  8:11   ` Hao Xu
2021-02-20 14:38     ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-21  9:16       ` Hao Xu
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/18] io-wq: don't pass 'wqe' needlessly around Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/18] arch: setup PF_IO_WORKER threads like PF_KTHREAD Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 22:21   ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-02-19 23:26     ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 08/18] kernel: treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD for ptrace/signals Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 09/18] io-wq: fork worker threads from original task Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 12:23   ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-04 13:05     ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 13:19       ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-04 16:13         ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-04 16:42           ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 17:09             ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-04 17:32               ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 18:19                 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 18:56                   ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-04 19:19                     ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 19:46                       ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-04 19:54                         ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 20:00                           ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 20:23                             ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 20:50                           ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-04 20:54                             ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-03-05 19:16           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-03-05 19:00       ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 10/18] io-wq: worker idling always returns false Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 11/18] io_uring: remove any grabbing of context Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 12/18] io_uring: remove io_identity Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 13/18] io-wq: only remove worker from free_list, if it was there Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 14/18] io-wq: make io_wq_fork_thread() available to other users Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 15/18] io_uring: move SQPOLL thread io-wq forked worker Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 16/18] Revert "proc: don't allow async path resolution of /proc/thread-self components" Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 17/18] Revert "proc: don't allow async path resolution of /proc/self components" Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 18/18] net: remove cmsg restriction from io_uring based send/recvmsg calls Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 23:44 ` [PATCHSET RFC 0/18] Remove kthread usage from io_uring Stefan Metzmacher
2021-02-19 23:51   ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-21  5:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-21 21:22   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox