From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA56C433E0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C26206E2 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="oFqPaC+P" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730394AbgF2TWp (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:22:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45100 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732264AbgF2TWo (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:22:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com (mail-pf1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1B6BC030F38 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id a127so8128840pfa.12 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:56:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jposRscsSWN2ezJYyGSapvHrQyr/kI6uo/RpsG6RWr8=; b=oFqPaC+Pe3IWsDb0e4Xfyg4b+jJ8wjBUpChCKJITc3IKlw4IR19DSAYraQcDBERQOL mX9ZMv1coIhRnWIQCxmlWeAgz9C8kkZrNIP7lN8q3Si0xMJrAbyTPQAbD+mB24KLdQpa S+Dz/1uDFSdl3ik26t68TNJrY6cLZeqAZ3x5+esKEO8HsX/CCJeMI+tpXjbrgjRBLhZb MaB1vhTH06JjVR0DLzXlRvx+RZ8HL26MS0U6Qs7YtkR0ubsSBycG4Nb9mrokeLIsrCzA 74QS42DoayxUZ4nXtp42m5iX33Bz0jZpNHwvzWz8fAE3Nw1iQP6fqzKzsLBq82vQDX4N otGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jposRscsSWN2ezJYyGSapvHrQyr/kI6uo/RpsG6RWr8=; b=fYF+HT3xkSNhj7xv4oCkyiKl2KGZRt3KL/SH7O07JeK8si3xdtyuxiy3C9CmFCUdw6 PChndH+zp9d+XGizbF3uo4hv4bOCSFYqJoyIy0Amp9r2AIpNgkj/od7fYUyKIGzYUQF+ z2hd5k3n8YP/Xt/ed1/hrU0NeKXhLo0yZ5KP0PQhaQ8q/ccl8eXmSiNWQdcLB/pHd02x mZEOCjxkl9VHdI97RTG353lnj4Br6a1JY8QGRrHzDvb26zEikBAIcq9Omo6b2oYWmj2r IgXYsA6cW936VgAsbx5zzh+Y/OA0JCw5wNV38vgwS2GhZlEbNIOMpcqUCKzJwZ9n5PSt +dBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306u4Cv1xeXY3VwZavSwaEygUFYmW6W2qcc4iKbSTGnvNmTalI+ PpDqMILJJNNfgVjsAslXSNdo1IsDvs1rpA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJweIQRBzsP3hwwsH57HpsuCGgvsNeZwfsRtkWRAEnIKI88Upyt5uSj7jDV2DEgm3hQyZsCfNQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:2983:: with SMTP id p125mr1921700pfp.302.1593449801914; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.86.197] (cpe-75-85-219-51.dc.res.rr.com. [75.85.219.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r13sm233559pfr.181.2020.06.29.09.56.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.9 0/4] moving grab_env() later before punt To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org References: From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <3a5f8125-acd7-771c-5c79-76ca1d8cc12c@kernel.dk> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:56:40 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: io-uring-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 6/29/20 10:18 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > This is a first part of patches cleaning up after recent link/tast_work > quick fixes. The main idea intention here is to make io_steal_work() > functional again. That's done in [4/4], others are preps. > > [4/4] may have its dragons, and even though I tested it > long enough, would love someone to take a closer look / test as well. 1-3 are straight forward, but I also didn't find any issues with 4 both reviewing it and also testing it. So I'll apply this series, thanks! -- Jens Axboe