public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 5/7] io_uring: post msg_ring CQE in task context
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 04:53:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb0e9ee516e182802da798258f303bf22ecdc151.1670207706.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>

On 12/4/22 7:44?PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> We want to limit post_aux_cqe() to the task context when ->task_complete
> is set, and so we can't just deliver a IORING_OP_MSG_RING CQE to another
> thread. Instead of trying to invent a new delayed CQE posting mechanism
> push them into the overflow list.

This is really the only one out of the series that I'm not a big fan of.
If we always rely on overflow for msg_ring, then that basically removes
it from being usable in a higher performance setting.

The natural way to do this would be to post the cqe via task_work for
the target, ring, but we also don't any storage available for that.
Might still be better to alloc something ala

struct tw_cqe_post {
	struct task_work work;
	s32 res;
	u32 flags;
	u64 user_data;
}

and post it with that?

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-05 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-05  2:44 [PATCH for-next 0/7] CQ locking optimisation Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-05  2:44 ` [PATCH for-next 1/7] io_uring: skip overflow CQE posting for dying ring Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-05  2:44 ` [PATCH for-next 2/7] io_uring: don't check overflow flush failures Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-05  2:44 ` [PATCH for-next 3/7] io_uring: complete all requests in task context Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-05  2:44 ` [PATCH for-next 4/7] io_uring: force multishot CQEs into " Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-05  2:44 ` [PATCH for-next 5/7] io_uring: post msg_ring CQE in " Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-05 11:53   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-12-05 15:12     ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-12-05 15:18       ` Jens Axboe
2022-12-06 10:42         ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-06 16:06           ` Jens Axboe
2022-12-07  3:59             ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-07 15:42               ` Jens Axboe
2022-12-05  2:44 ` [PATCH for-next 6/7] io_uring: use tw for putting rsrc Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-05  2:44 ` [PATCH for-next 7/7] io_uring: skip spinlocking for ->task_complete Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-06 16:53 ` [PATCH for-next 0/7] CQ locking optimisation Jens Axboe
2022-12-06 17:17 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox