From: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] io_uring: make io_buffer_select() return the user address directly
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 12:43:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2022-05-09 at 06:28 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/9/22 6:12 AM, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-05-09 at 12:06 +0000, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2022-05-01 at 14:56 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > There's no point in having callers provide a kbuf, we're just
> > > > returning
> > > > the address anyway.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/io_uring.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > @@ -6013,10 +6006,11 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb
> > > > *req,
> > > > unsigned int issue_flags)
> > > > return -ENOTSOCK;
> > > >
> > > > if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECT) {
> > > > - kbuf = io_buffer_select(req, &sr->len, sr-
> > > > >bgid,
> > > > issue_flags);
> > > > - if (IS_ERR(kbuf))
> > > > - return PTR_ERR(kbuf);
> > > > - buf = u64_to_user_ptr(kbuf->addr);
> > > > + void __user *buf;
> > >
> > > this now shadows the outer buf, and so does not work at all as
> > > the buf
> > > value is lost.
> > > A bit surprised this did not show up in any tests.
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > + buf = io_buffer_select(req, &sr->len, sr->bgid,
> > > > issue_flags);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(buf))
> > > > + return PTR_ERR(buf);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > ret = import_single_range(READ, buf, sr->len, &iov,
> > > > &msg.msg_iter);
> > >
> >
> > The following seems to fix it for me. I can submit it separately if
> > you
> > like.
>
> I think you want something like this:
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 19dd3ba92486..2b87c89d2375 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -5599,7 +5599,6 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req,
> unsigned int issue_flags)
> {
> struct io_sr_msg *sr = &req->sr_msg;
> struct msghdr msg;
> - void __user *buf = sr->buf;
> struct socket *sock;
> struct iovec iov;
> unsigned flags;
> @@ -5620,9 +5619,10 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req,
> unsigned int issue_flags)
> buf = io_buffer_select(req, &sr->len, sr->bgid,
> issue_flags);
> if (IS_ERR(buf))
> return PTR_ERR(buf);
> + sr->buf = buf;
this line I think was added later on anyway in "io_uring: never call
io_buffer_select() for a buffer re-select"
> }
>
> - ret = import_single_range(READ, buf, sr->len, &iov,
> &msg.msg_iter);
> + ret = import_single_range(READ, sr->buf, sr->len, &iov,
> &msg.msg_iter);
> if (unlikely(ret))
> goto out_free;
>
>
I'll send a patch now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-09 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-01 20:56 [PATCHSET v4 0/16] Add support for ring mapped provided buffers Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 01/16] io_uring: kill io_recv_buffer_select() wrapper Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 02/16] io_uring: use 'sr' vs 'req->sr_msg' consistently Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 03/16] io_uring: make io_buffer_select() return the user address directly Jens Axboe
2022-05-09 12:06 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-05-09 12:12 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-05-09 12:28 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-09 12:43 ` Dylan Yudaken [this message]
2022-05-09 12:46 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-09 12:21 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 04/16] io_uring: kill io_rw_buffer_select() wrapper Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 05/16] io_uring: ignore ->buf_index if REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECT isn't set Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 06/16] io_uring: always use req->buf_index for the provided buffer group Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 07/16] io_uring: get rid of hashed provided buffer groups Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 08/16] io_uring: never call io_buffer_select() for a buffer re-select Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 09/16] io_uring: abstract out provided buffer list selection Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 10/16] io_uring: move provided and fixed buffers into the same io_kiocb area Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 11/16] io_uring: move provided buffer state closer to submit state Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 12/16] io_uring: eliminate the need to track provided buffer ID separately Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 13/16] io_uring: don't clear req->kbuf when buffer selection is done Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 14/16] io_uring: add buffer selection support to IORING_OP_NOP Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 15/16] io_uring: add io_pin_pages() helper Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 20:56 ` [PATCH 16/16] io_uring: add support for ring mapped supplied buffers Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b740d592d850593b5344b35bdc2e52399a008c3.camel@fb.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox