From: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.10-rc1
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:49:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 13/10/2020 21.49, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/13/20 1:46 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 6:46 AM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here are the io_uring updates for 5.10.
>>
>> Very strange. My clang build gives a warning I've never seen before:
>>
>> /tmp/io_uring-dd40c4.s:26476: Warning: ignoring changed section
>> attributes for .data..read_mostly
>>
>> and looking at what clang generates for the *.s file, it seems to be
>> the "section" line in:
>>
>> .type io_op_defs,@object # @io_op_defs
>> .section .data..read_mostly,"a",@progbits
>> .p2align 4
>>
>> I think it's the combination of "const" and "__read_mostly".
>>
>> I think the warning is sensible: how can a piece of data be both
>> "const" and "__read_mostly"? If it's "const", then it's not "mostly"
>> read - it had better be _always_ read.
>>
>> I'm letting it go, and I've pulled this (gcc doesn't complain), but
>> please have a look.
>
> Huh weird, I'll take a look. FWIW, the construct isn't unique across
> the kernel.
Citation needed. There's lots of "pointer to const foo" stuff declared
as __read_mostly, but I can't find any objects that are themselves both
const and __read_mostly. Other than that io_op_defs and io_uring_fops now.
But... there's something a little weird:
$ grep read_most -- fs/io_uring.s
.section .data..read_mostly,"a",@progbits
$ readelf --wide -S fs/io_uring.o | grep read_most
[32] .data..read_mostly PROGBITS 0000000000000000 01b4e0 000188
00 WA 0 0 32
(this is with gcc/gas). So despite that .section directive not saying
"aw", the section got the W flag anyway. There are lots of
.section "__tracepoints_ptrs", "a"
.pushsection .smp_locks,"a"
in the .s file, and those sections do end up with just the A bit in the
.o file. Does gas maybe somehow special-case a section name starting
with .data?
Rasmus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-13 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-12 13:46 [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.10-rc1 Jens Axboe
2020-10-13 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-13 19:49 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-13 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-13 20:49 ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2020-10-13 21:00 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-13 21:06 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-14 17:43 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-10-13 19:47 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e37f236-c0ce-abb0-fa89-2118dd18d042@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox