From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, Hao Xu <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] fast poll multishot mode
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 17:01:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 5/6/22 15:18, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/6/22 1:36 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I actually had a question about the current poll code, from the code it
>> seems when we cancel a poll-like request, it will ignore the existing
>> events and just raise a -ECANCELED cqe though I haven't tested it. Is
>> this by design or am I missing something?
>
> That's by design, but honestly I don't think anyone considered the case
> where it's being canceled but has events already. For that case, I think
> we should follow the usual logic of only returning an error (canceled)
> if we don't have events, if we have events just return them. For
> multi-shot, obviously also terminate, but same logic there.
Why would we care? It's inherently racy in any case and any
user not handling this is already screwed.
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-06 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 7:00 [PATCH v2 0/5] fast poll multishot mode Hao Xu
2022-05-06 7:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: add IORING_ACCEPT_MULTISHOT for accept Hao Xu
2022-05-06 14:32 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 4:05 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-06 7:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: add REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT for requests Hao Xu
2022-05-06 7:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: let fast poll support multishot Hao Xu
2022-05-06 17:19 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-06 22:02 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 6:32 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-07 9:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-07 7:08 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-07 9:47 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-07 11:06 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-06 18:02 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-06 7:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: add a helper for poll clean Hao Xu
2022-05-06 11:04 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-06 12:47 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-06 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 6:37 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-06 16:22 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-07 6:43 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-07 9:29 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-06 7:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: implement multishot mode for accept Hao Xu
2022-05-06 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 9:13 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-06 20:50 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-06 21:29 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-06 7:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] fast poll multishot mode Hao Xu
2022-05-06 14:18 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-06 16:01 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-05-06 16:03 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-06 22:23 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-06 23:26 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 2:33 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 3:08 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 16:01 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox