From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: move poll update into remove not add
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:43:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ff0d0f4b251b4a3b6ea6a1a033fef84a494b42d.1618396839.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Having poll update function as a part of IORING_OP_POLL_ADD is not
great, we have to do hack around struct layouts and add some overhead in
the way of more popular POLL_ADD. Even more serious drawback is that
POLL_ADD requires file and always grabs it, and so poll update, which
doesn't need it.
Incorporate poll update into IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE instead of
IORING_OP_POLL_ADD. It also more consistent with timeout remove/update.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index da5061f38fd6..e8fcb894223f 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -501,11 +501,6 @@ struct io_poll_update {
bool update_user_data;
};
-struct io_poll_remove {
- struct file *file;
- u64 addr;
-};
-
struct io_close {
struct file *file;
int fd;
@@ -715,7 +710,6 @@ enum {
REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE_BIT,
REQ_F_REISSUE_BIT,
REQ_F_DONT_REISSUE_BIT,
- REQ_F_POLL_UPDATE_BIT,
/* keep async read/write and isreg together and in order */
REQ_F_ASYNC_READ_BIT,
REQ_F_ASYNC_WRITE_BIT,
@@ -763,8 +757,6 @@ enum {
REQ_F_REISSUE = BIT(REQ_F_REISSUE_BIT),
/* don't attempt request reissue, see io_rw_reissue() */
REQ_F_DONT_REISSUE = BIT(REQ_F_DONT_REISSUE_BIT),
- /* switches between poll and poll update */
- REQ_F_POLL_UPDATE = BIT(REQ_F_POLL_UPDATE_BIT),
/* supports async reads */
REQ_F_ASYNC_READ = BIT(REQ_F_ASYNC_READ_BIT),
/* supports async writes */
@@ -795,7 +787,6 @@ struct io_kiocb {
struct io_rw rw;
struct io_poll_iocb poll;
struct io_poll_update poll_update;
- struct io_poll_remove poll_remove;
struct io_accept accept;
struct io_sync sync;
struct io_cancel cancel;
@@ -5305,35 +5296,36 @@ static __poll_t io_poll_parse_events(const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
return demangle_poll(events) | (events & (EPOLLEXCLUSIVE|EPOLLONESHOT));
}
-static int io_poll_remove_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
+static int io_poll_update_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
{
+ struct io_poll_update *upd = &req->poll_update;
+ u32 flags;
+
if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
return -EINVAL;
- if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->off || sqe->len || sqe->buf_index ||
- sqe->poll_events)
+ if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->buf_index)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
+ if (flags & ~(IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS | IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA |
+ IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ /* meaningless without update */
+ if (flags == IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI)
return -EINVAL;
- req->poll_remove.addr = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
- return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * Find a running poll command that matches one specified in sqe->addr,
- * and remove it if found.
- */
-static int io_poll_remove(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
-{
- struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
- int ret;
+ upd->old_user_data = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
+ upd->update_events = flags & IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS;
+ upd->update_user_data = flags & IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA;
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
- ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, req->poll_remove.addr, true);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
+ upd->new_user_data = READ_ONCE(sqe->off);
+ if (!upd->update_user_data && upd->new_user_data)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (upd->update_events)
+ upd->events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
+ else if (sqe->poll32_events)
+ return -EINVAL;
- if (ret < 0)
- req_set_fail_links(req);
- __io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, 0);
return 0;
}
@@ -5356,40 +5348,22 @@ static void io_poll_queue_proc(struct file *file, struct wait_queue_head *head,
static int io_poll_add_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
{
- u32 events, flags;
+ struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll;
+ u32 flags;
if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
return -EINVAL;
- if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->buf_index)
+ if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->buf_index || sqe->off || sqe->addr)
return -EINVAL;
flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
- if (flags & ~(IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI | IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS |
- IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA))
+ if (flags & ~IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI)
return -EINVAL;
- events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
-
- if (flags & (IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS|IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA)) {
- struct io_poll_update *poll_upd = &req->poll_update;
-
- req->flags |= REQ_F_POLL_UPDATE;
- poll_upd->events = events;
- poll_upd->old_user_data = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
- poll_upd->update_events = flags & IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS;
- poll_upd->update_user_data = flags & IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA;
- if (poll_upd->update_user_data)
- poll_upd->new_user_data = READ_ONCE(sqe->off);
- } else {
- struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll;
-
- poll->events = events;
- if (sqe->off || sqe->addr)
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ poll->events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
return 0;
}
-static int __io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static int io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll;
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
@@ -5415,7 +5389,7 @@ static int __io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
return ipt.error;
}
-static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct io_kiocb *preq;
@@ -5429,6 +5403,12 @@ static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req)
goto err;
}
+ if (!req->poll_update.update_events && !req->poll_update.update_user_data) {
+ completing = true;
+ ret = io_poll_remove_one(req) ? 0 : -EALREADY;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
/*
* Don't allow racy completion with singleshot, as we cannot safely
* update those. For multishot, if we're racing with completion, just
@@ -5456,14 +5436,13 @@ static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req)
}
if (req->poll_update.update_user_data)
preq->user_data = req->poll_update.new_user_data;
-
spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
/* complete update request, we're done with it */
io_req_complete(req, ret);
if (!completing) {
- ret = __io_poll_add(preq);
+ ret = io_poll_add(preq, issue_flags);
if (ret < 0) {
req_set_fail_links(preq);
io_req_complete(preq, ret);
@@ -5472,13 +5451,6 @@ static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req)
return 0;
}
-static int io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
-{
- if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_POLL_UPDATE))
- return __io_poll_add(req);
- return io_poll_update(req);
-}
-
static enum hrtimer_restart io_timeout_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
{
struct io_timeout_data *data = container_of(timer,
@@ -5883,7 +5855,7 @@ static int io_req_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
case IORING_OP_POLL_ADD:
return io_poll_add_prep(req, sqe);
case IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE:
- return io_poll_remove_prep(req, sqe);
+ return io_poll_update_prep(req, sqe);
case IORING_OP_FSYNC:
return io_fsync_prep(req, sqe);
case IORING_OP_SYNC_FILE_RANGE:
@@ -6114,7 +6086,7 @@ static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
ret = io_poll_add(req, issue_flags);
break;
case IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE:
- ret = io_poll_remove(req, issue_flags);
+ ret = io_poll_update(req, issue_flags);
break;
case IORING_OP_SYNC_FILE_RANGE:
ret = io_sync_file_range(req, issue_flags);
--
2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 10:43 [PATCH 5.13 0/5] poll update into poll remove Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-14 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: improve sqpoll event/state handling Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-14 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: refactor io_ring_exit_work() Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-14 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: fix POLL_REMOVE removing apoll Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-14 10:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: add helper for parsing poll events Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-14 10:43 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-04-14 12:34 ` [PATCH 5.13 0/5] poll update into poll remove Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ff0d0f4b251b4a3b6ea6a1a033fef84a494b42d.1618396839.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox