From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH for-next] io_uring: kill callback_head argument for io_req_task_work_add()
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:01:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
We always use &req->task_work anyway, no point in passing it in.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index f617f1a725e1..c409af7bd444 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1886,8 +1886,7 @@ static struct io_kiocb *io_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req)
return __io_req_find_next(req);
}
-static int io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, struct callback_head *cb,
- bool twa_signal_ok)
+static int io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, bool twa_signal_ok)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = req->task;
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
@@ -1906,7 +1905,7 @@ static int io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, struct callback_head *cb,
if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) && twa_signal_ok)
notify = TWA_SIGNAL;
- ret = task_work_add(tsk, cb, notify);
+ ret = task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, notify);
if (!ret)
wake_up_process(tsk);
@@ -1965,7 +1964,7 @@ static void io_req_task_queue(struct io_kiocb *req)
init_task_work(&req->task_work, io_req_task_submit);
percpu_ref_get(&req->ctx->refs);
- ret = io_req_task_work_add(req, &req->task_work, true);
+ ret = io_req_task_work_add(req, true);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -3185,7 +3184,7 @@ static int io_async_buf_func(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode,
/* submit ref gets dropped, acquire a new one */
refcount_inc(&req->refs);
- ret = io_req_task_work_add(req, &req->task_work, true);
+ ret = io_req_task_work_add(req, true);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -4752,7 +4751,7 @@ static int __io_async_wake(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_poll_iocb *poll,
* of executing it. We can't safely execute it anyway, as we may not
* have the needed state needed for it anyway.
*/
- ret = io_req_task_work_add(req, &req->task_work, twa_signal_ok);
+ ret = io_req_task_work_add(req, twa_signal_ok);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
struct task_struct *tsk;
--
Jens Axboe
reply other threads:[~2020-10-01 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox