From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v2 21/25] io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:41:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6235e12830a225584b90cf3b29f09a0681acc95.1655213915.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
On 6/14/22 22:37, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Add a new IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER flag and the userspace visible part
> of it, i.e. put limitations of submitters. Also, don't allow it together
> with IOPOLL as we're not going to put it to good use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 5 ++++-
> io_uring/io_uring.c | 7 +++++--
> io_uring/io_uring_types.h | 1 +
> io_uring/tctx.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> io_uring/tctx.h | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> index a41ddb8c5e1f..a3a691340d3e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> @@ -138,9 +138,12 @@ enum {
> * IORING_SQ_TASKRUN in the sq ring flags. Not valid with COOP_TASKRUN.
> */
> #define IORING_SETUP_TASKRUN_FLAG (1U << 9)
> -
> #define IORING_SETUP_SQE128 (1U << 10) /* SQEs are 128 byte */
> #define IORING_SETUP_CQE32 (1U << 11) /* CQEs are 32 byte */
> +/*
> + * Only one task is allowed to submit requests
> + */
> +#define IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER (1U << 12)
>
> enum io_uring_op {
> IORING_OP_NOP,
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> index 15d209f334eb..4b90439808e3 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> @@ -3020,6 +3020,8 @@ static __cold void io_ring_ctx_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> io_destroy_buffers(ctx);
> if (ctx->sq_creds)
> put_cred(ctx->sq_creds);
> + if (ctx->submitter_task)
> + put_task_struct(ctx->submitter_task);
>
> /* there are no registered resources left, nobody uses it */
> if (ctx->rsrc_node)
> @@ -3752,7 +3754,7 @@ static int io_uring_install_fd(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct file *file)
> if (fd < 0)
> return fd;
>
> - ret = io_uring_add_tctx_node(ctx);
> + ret = __io_uring_add_tctx_node(ctx, false);
> if (ret) {
> put_unused_fd(fd);
> return ret;
> @@ -3972,7 +3974,8 @@ static long io_uring_setup(u32 entries, struct io_uring_params __user *params)
> IORING_SETUP_CLAMP | IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ |
> IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED | IORING_SETUP_SUBMIT_ALL |
> IORING_SETUP_COOP_TASKRUN | IORING_SETUP_TASKRUN_FLAG |
> - IORING_SETUP_SQE128 | IORING_SETUP_CQE32))
> + IORING_SETUP_SQE128 | IORING_SETUP_CQE32 |
> + IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return io_uring_create(entries, &p, params);
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring_types.h b/io_uring/io_uring_types.h
> index aba0f8cd6f49..f6d0ad25f377 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring_types.h
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring_types.h
> @@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
> /* Keep this last, we don't need it for the fast path */
>
> struct io_restriction restrictions;
> + struct task_struct *submitter_task;
>
> /* slow path rsrc auxilary data, used by update/register */
> struct io_rsrc_node *rsrc_backup_node;
> diff --git a/io_uring/tctx.c b/io_uring/tctx.c
> index 6adf659687f8..012be261dc50 100644
> --- a/io_uring/tctx.c
> +++ b/io_uring/tctx.c
> @@ -81,12 +81,32 @@ __cold int io_uring_alloc_task_context(struct task_struct *task,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int __io_uring_add_tctx_node(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +static int io_register_submitter(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
> + if (!ctx->submitter_task)
> + ctx->submitter_task = get_task_struct(current);
> + else if (ctx->submitter_task != current)
> + ret = -EEXIST;
> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
Seems we don't need this uring_lock:
When we create a ring, we setup ctx->submitter_task before uring fd is
installed so at that time nobody else can enter this code.
when we enter this code later in io_uring_enter, we just read it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 14:36 [PATCH for-next v2 00/25] 5.20 cleanups and poll optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 01/25] io_uring: make reg buf init consistent Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 02/25] io_uring: move defer_list to slow data Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 03/25] io_uring: better caching for ctx timeout fields Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 04/25] io_uring: refactor ctx slow data placement Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 7:58 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-15 10:11 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 10:59 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 05/25] io_uring: move small helpers to headers Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 06/25] io_uring: explain io_wq_work::cancel_seq placement Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 07/25] io_uring: inline ->registered_rings Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 08/25] io_uring: don't set REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE in tw Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 09/25] io_uring: never defer-complete multi-apoll Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 8:05 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 10/25] io_uring: kill REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 8:20 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-15 10:18 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 10:19 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 11/25] io_uring: refactor io_req_task_complete() Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 17:45 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-14 17:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 12/25] io_uring: don't inline io_put_kbuf Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 13/25] io_uring: remove check_cq checking from hot paths Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 14/25] io_uring: poll: remove unnecessary req->ref set Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 15/25] io_uring: switch cancel_hash to use per entry spinlock Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 16/25] io_uring: pass poll_find lock back Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 17/25] io_uring: clean up io_try_cancel Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 18/25] io_uring: limit number hash buckets Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 19/25] io_uring: clean up io_ring_ctx_alloc Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 8:46 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 20/25] io_uring: use state completion infra for poll reqs Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 21/25] io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 9:34 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-15 10:20 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 9:41 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2022-06-15 10:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 11:08 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 22/25] io_uring: pass hash table into poll_find Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 23/25] io_uring: introduce a struct for hash table Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 24/25] io_uring: propagate locking state to poll cancel Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 25/25] io_uring: mutex locked poll hashing Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 12:53 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-15 13:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 15:19 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox