* [PATCH liburing v3 0/2] add support for new timeout feature
@ 2020-08-05 3:04 Jiufei Xue
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiufei Xue @ 2020-08-05 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: io-uring, metze
Kernel can handle timeout when feature IORING_FEAT_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT
supported. Applications should use io_uring_set_cqwait_timeout()
explicitly to asked for the new feature.
Changes since v2:
- bump the version to 2.0.7 since we have changed the size of io_uring
- add more pad to structure io_uring for future flexibility
Jiufei Xue (2):
io_uring_enter: add timeout support
test/timeout: add testcase for new timeout feature
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH liburing v3 0/2] add support for new timeout feature
@ 2020-08-05 3:28 Carter Li 李通洲
2020-08-05 5:17 ` Jiufei Xue
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carter Li 李通洲 @ 2020-08-05 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiufei Xue; +Cc: io-uring
> diff --git a/src/include/liburing.h b/src/include/liburing.h
> index 0505a4f..82c2980 100644
> --- a/src/include/liburing.h
> +++ b/src/include/liburing.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ struct io_uring {
> struct io_uring_sq sq;
> struct io_uring_cq cq;
> unsigned flags;
> + unsigned flags_internal;
> + unsigned features;
> + unsigned pad[4];
> int ring_fd;
> };
Won't it break existing code runs on newer kernel?
Won't it break code compiled with new liburing but runs on older kernel?
IMO In this case, a new syscall `io_uring_setup2` is required at least.
Regards,
Carter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH liburing v3 0/2] add support for new timeout feature
2020-08-05 3:28 [PATCH liburing v3 0/2] add support for new timeout feature Carter Li 李通洲
@ 2020-08-05 5:17 ` Jiufei Xue
2020-08-05 6:18 ` Carter Li 李通洲
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiufei Xue @ 2020-08-05 5:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carter Li 李通洲; +Cc: io-uring
On 2020/8/5 上午11:28, Carter Li 李通洲 wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/include/liburing.h b/src/include/liburing.h
>> index 0505a4f..82c2980 100644
>> --- a/src/include/liburing.h
>> +++ b/src/include/liburing.h
>> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ struct io_uring {
>> struct io_uring_sq sq;
>> struct io_uring_cq cq;
>> unsigned flags;
>> + unsigned flags_internal;
>> + unsigned features;
>> + unsigned pad[4];
>> int ring_fd;
>> };
>
> Won't it break existing code runs on newer kernel?
io_uring is a structure that used in userspace. It breaks the API
with existing compiled application. So I have changed the soname
to 2.0.7.
And for syscall io_uring_enter(), I have added a new feature bit
IORING_FEAT_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT and io_uring_enter() flag
IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT. Here are 3 cases below:
1) old liburing <-> new kernel: old liburing can not pass the flag
IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT, so new kernel will parse the arguments
the original way.
2) new liburing <-> old kernel: feature IORING_FEAT_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT
not supported, liburing will do things like before.
3) new liburing <-> new kernel: feature IORING_FEAT_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT
supported, liburing pass the new arguments with the flag
IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT which helps kernel parse the arguments
correctly.
Thanks,
Jiufei.
> Won't it break code compiled with new liburing but runs on older kernel?
>
> IMO In this case, a new syscall `io_uring_setup2` is required at least.
>
> Regards,
> Carter
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH liburing v3 0/2] add support for new timeout feature
2020-08-05 5:17 ` Jiufei Xue
@ 2020-08-05 6:18 ` Carter Li 李通洲
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carter Li 李通洲 @ 2020-08-05 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiufei Xue; +Cc: io-uring
Sorry. I was thinking the pointer of io_uring will be passed with
io_uring_setup. My fault.
> 2020年8月5日 下午1:17,Jiufei Xue <[email protected]> 写道:
>
>
>
> On 2020/8/5 上午11:28, Carter Li 李通洲 wrote:
>>> diff --git a/src/include/liburing.h b/src/include/liburing.h
>>> index 0505a4f..82c2980 100644
>>> --- a/src/include/liburing.h
>>> +++ b/src/include/liburing.h
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ struct io_uring {
>>> struct io_uring_sq sq;
>>> struct io_uring_cq cq;
>>> unsigned flags;
>>> + unsigned flags_internal;
>>> + unsigned features;
>>> + unsigned pad[4];
>>> int ring_fd;
>>> };
>>
>> Won't it break existing code runs on newer kernel?
>
> io_uring is a structure that used in userspace. It breaks the API
> with existing compiled application. So I have changed the soname
> to 2.0.7.
>
> And for syscall io_uring_enter(), I have added a new feature bit
> IORING_FEAT_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT and io_uring_enter() flag
> IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT. Here are 3 cases below:
>
> 1) old liburing <-> new kernel: old liburing can not pass the flag
> IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT, so new kernel will parse the arguments
> the original way.
>
> 2) new liburing <-> old kernel: feature IORING_FEAT_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT
> not supported, liburing will do things like before.
>
> 3) new liburing <-> new kernel: feature IORING_FEAT_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT
> supported, liburing pass the new arguments with the flag
> IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT which helps kernel parse the arguments
> correctly.
>
> Thanks,
> Jiufei.
>
>> Won't it break code compiled with new liburing but runs on older kernel?
>>
>
>> IMO In this case, a new syscall `io_uring_setup2` is required at least.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Carter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-05 6:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-05 3:28 [PATCH liburing v3 0/2] add support for new timeout feature Carter Li 李通洲
2020-08-05 5:17 ` Jiufei Xue
2020-08-05 6:18 ` Carter Li 李通洲
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-05 3:04 Jiufei Xue
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox