public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>,
	Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
	Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: correct check for O_TMPFILE
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 18:29:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 8/5/23 4:48?PM, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> O_TMPFILE is actually __O_TMPFILE|O_DIRECTORY. This means that the old
> check for whether RESOLVE_CACHED can be used would incorrectly think
> that O_DIRECTORY could not be used with RESOLVE_CACHED.
> 
> Cc: [email protected] # v5.12+
> Fixes: 3a81fd02045c ("io_uring: enable LOOKUP_CACHED path resolution for filename lookups")
> Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>
> ---
>  io_uring/openclose.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/io_uring/openclose.c b/io_uring/openclose.c
> index 10ca57f5bd24..a029c230119f 100644
> --- a/io_uring/openclose.c
> +++ b/io_uring/openclose.c
> @@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ static bool io_openat_force_async(struct io_open *open)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * Don't bother trying for O_TRUNC, O_CREAT, or O_TMPFILE open,
> -	 * it'll always -EAGAIN
> +	 * it'll always -EAGAIN.

Please don't make this change, it just detracts from the actual change.
And if we are making changes in there, why not change O_TMPFILE as well
since this is what the change is about?

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-06  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-05 22:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] open: make RESOLVE_CACHED correctly test for O_TMPFILE Aleksa Sarai
2023-08-05 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Aleksa Sarai
2023-08-05 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: correct check " Aleksa Sarai
2023-08-06  0:29   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-08-06  6:42     ` Aleksa Sarai
2023-08-06 16:41       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox