From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: correct check for O_TMPFILE
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 18:29:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 8/5/23 4:48?PM, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> O_TMPFILE is actually __O_TMPFILE|O_DIRECTORY. This means that the old
> check for whether RESOLVE_CACHED can be used would incorrectly think
> that O_DIRECTORY could not be used with RESOLVE_CACHED.
>
> Cc: [email protected] # v5.12+
> Fixes: 3a81fd02045c ("io_uring: enable LOOKUP_CACHED path resolution for filename lookups")
> Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>
> ---
> io_uring/openclose.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/openclose.c b/io_uring/openclose.c
> index 10ca57f5bd24..a029c230119f 100644
> --- a/io_uring/openclose.c
> +++ b/io_uring/openclose.c
> @@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ static bool io_openat_force_async(struct io_open *open)
> {
> /*
> * Don't bother trying for O_TRUNC, O_CREAT, or O_TMPFILE open,
> - * it'll always -EAGAIN
> + * it'll always -EAGAIN.
Please don't make this change, it just detracts from the actual change.
And if we are making changes in there, why not change O_TMPFILE as well
since this is what the change is about?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-06 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-05 22:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] open: make RESOLVE_CACHED correctly test for O_TMPFILE Aleksa Sarai
2023-08-05 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Aleksa Sarai
2023-08-05 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: correct check " Aleksa Sarai
2023-08-06 0:29 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-08-06 6:42 ` Aleksa Sarai
2023-08-06 16:41 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox