public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: syzbot <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in __io_uring_files_cancel
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:48:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 09/10/2020 15:35, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 03:28:54PM +0300, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 09/10/2020 15:12, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>> It seems this fails on "node->shift" in xas_next_entry(), that would
>>>> mean that the node itself was freed while we're iterating on it.
>>>>
>>>> __io_uring_files_cancel() iterates with xas_next_entry() and creates
>>>> XA_STATE once by hand, but it also removes entries in the loop with
>>>> io_uring_del_task_file() -> xas_store(&xas, NULL); without updating
>>>> the iterating XA_STATE. Could it be the problem? See a diff below
>>>
>>> No, the problem is that the lock is dropped after calling
>>> xas_next_entry(), and at any point after calling xas_next_entry(),
>>> the node that it's pointing to can be freed.
>>
>> Only the task itself clears/removes entries, others can only insert.
>> So, could it be freed even though there are no parallel erases?
> 
> Not with today's implementation, but that's something that might
> change in the future.  I agree it's probably the task itself that's
> deleting the entry and causing the node to be deleted.

I see, then it looks like I narrowed it down right. But your
approach is cleaner anyway.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

      reply	other threads:[~2020-10-09 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-09  8:02 KASAN: use-after-free Read in __io_uring_files_cancel syzbot
2020-10-09 11:10 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-09 12:12   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-09 12:28     ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-09 12:35       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-09 12:48         ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox