public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: optimise mb() in io_req_local_work_add
Date: Thu,  6 Oct 2022 02:06:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43983bc8bc507172adda7a0f00cab1aff09fd238.1665018309.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)

io_cqring_wake() needs a barrier for the waitqueue_active() check.
However, in case of io_req_local_work_add() prior it calls llist_add(),
which implies an atomic, and with that we can replace smb_mb() with
smp_mb__after_atomic().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 io_uring/io_uring.c |  5 +++--
 io_uring/io_uring.h | 11 +++++++++--
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 5e7c086685bf..355fc1f3083d 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -1106,6 +1106,8 @@ static void io_req_local_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
 
 	if (!llist_add(&req->io_task_work.node, &ctx->work_llist))
 		return;
+	/* need it for the following io_cqring_wake() */
+	smp_mb__after_atomic();
 
 	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&req->task->io_uring->in_idle))) {
 		io_move_task_work_from_local(ctx);
@@ -1117,8 +1119,7 @@ static void io_req_local_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
 
 	if (ctx->has_evfd)
 		io_eventfd_signal(ctx);
-	io_cqring_wake(ctx);
-
+	__io_cqring_wake(ctx);
 }
 
 static inline void __io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, bool allow_local)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
index 177bd55357d7..e733d31f31d2 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
@@ -203,17 +203,24 @@ static inline void io_commit_cqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	smp_store_release(&ctx->rings->cq.tail, ctx->cached_cq_tail);
 }
 
-static inline void io_cqring_wake(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+/* requires smb_mb() prior, see wq_has_sleeper() */
+static inline void __io_cqring_wake(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
 	/*
 	 * wake_up_all() may seem excessive, but io_wake_function() and
 	 * io_should_wake() handle the termination of the loop and only
 	 * wake as many waiters as we need to.
 	 */
-	if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait))
+	if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->cq_wait))
 		wake_up_all(&ctx->cq_wait);
 }
 
+static inline void io_cqring_wake(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	smp_mb();
+	__io_cqring_wake(ctx);
+}
+
 static inline bool io_sqring_full(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
 	struct io_rings *r = ctx->rings;
-- 
2.37.3


             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-06  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-06  1:06 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-10-06 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: optimise mb() in io_req_local_work_add Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43983bc8bc507172adda7a0f00cab1aff09fd238.1665018309.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox