public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>,
	Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>,
	Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Add to traces the req pointer when available
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 09:21:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 5/25/21 6:54 AM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> The req pointer uniquely identify a specific request.
> Having it in traces can provide valuable insights that is not possible
> to have if the calling process is reusing the same user_data value.

How about hashing kernel pointers per discussed? Even if it's better
to have it done by tracing or something as you mentioned, there is no
such a thing at the moment, so should be done by hand.

Btw, I'd incline you to split it in two patches, a cleanup and one
adding req, because it's unreadable and hides the real change

> ---
>  fs/io_uring.c                   |  8 +--
>  include/trace/events/io_uring.h | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 5f82954004f6..496588ca984c 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -5059,7 +5059,7 @@ static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb)
>  	struct async_poll *apoll = req->apoll;
>  	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
>  
> -	trace_io_uring_task_run(req->ctx, req->opcode, req->user_data);
> +	trace_io_uring_task_run(req->ctx, req, req->opcode, req->user_data);
>  
>  	if (io_poll_rewait(req, &apoll->poll)) {
>  		spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
> @@ -5192,8 +5192,8 @@ static bool io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req)
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
> -	trace_io_uring_poll_arm(ctx, req->opcode, req->user_data, mask,
> -					apoll->poll.events);
> +	trace_io_uring_poll_arm(ctx, req, req->opcode, req->user_data,
> +				mask, apoll->poll.events);
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> @@ -6578,7 +6578,7 @@ static int io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
>  		goto fail_req;
>  
>  	/* don't need @sqe from now on */
> -	trace_io_uring_submit_sqe(ctx, req->opcode, req->user_data,
> +	trace_io_uring_submit_sqe(ctx, req, req->opcode, req->user_data,
>  				true, ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL);
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/io_uring.h b/include/trace/events/io_uring.h
> index abb8b24744fd..12861e98c08d 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/io_uring.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/io_uring.h
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_file_get,
>   *
>   * @ctx:	pointer to a ring context structure
>   * @hashed:	type of workqueue, hashed or normal
> - * @req:	pointer to a submitted request
> + * @req:	pointer to a queued request
>   * @work:	pointer to a submitted io_wq_work
>   *
>   * Allows to trace asynchronous work submission.
> @@ -142,9 +142,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_queue_async_work,
>  	TP_ARGS(ctx, rw, req, work, flags),
>  
>  	TP_STRUCT__entry (
> -		__field(  void *,				ctx		)
> -		__field(  int,					rw		)
> -		__field(  void *,				req		)
> +		__field(  void *,			ctx	)
> +		__field(  int,				rw	)
> +		__field(  void *,			req	)
>  		__field(  struct io_wq_work *,		work	)
>  		__field(  unsigned int,			flags	)
>  	),
> @@ -196,10 +196,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_defer,
>  
>  /**
>   * io_uring_link - called before the io_uring request added into link_list of
> - * 				   another request
> + *		   another request
>   *
> - * @ctx:			pointer to a ring context structure
> - * @req:			pointer to a linked request
> + * @ctx:		pointer to a ring context structure
> + * @req:		pointer to a linked request
>   * @target_req:		pointer to a previous request, that would contain @req
>   *
>   * Allows to track linked requests, to understand dependencies between requests
> @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_link,
>  	TP_ARGS(ctx, req, target_req),
>  
>  	TP_STRUCT__entry (
> -		__field(  void *,	ctx			)
> -		__field(  void *,	req			)
> +		__field(  void *,	ctx		)
> +		__field(  void *,	req		)
>  		__field(  void *,	target_req	)
>  	),
>  
> @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_cqring_wait,
>  	TP_ARGS(ctx, min_events),
>  
>  	TP_STRUCT__entry (
> -		__field(  void *,	ctx			)
> +		__field(  void *,	ctx		)
>  		__field(  int,		min_events	)
>  	),
>  
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_fail_link,
>  	TP_ARGS(req, link),
>  
>  	TP_STRUCT__entry (
> -		__field(  void *,	req		)
> +		__field(  void *,	req	)
>  		__field(  void *,	link	)
>  	),
>  
> @@ -314,15 +314,15 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_complete,
>  	),
>  
>  	TP_printk("ring %p, user_data 0x%llx, result %ld, cflags %x",
> -			  __entry->ctx, (unsigned long long)__entry->user_data,
> -			  __entry->res, __entry->cflags)
> +		   __entry->ctx, (unsigned long long)__entry->user_data,
> +		   __entry->res, __entry->cflags)
>  );
>  
> -
>  /**
>   * io_uring_submit_sqe - called before submitting one SQE
>   *
>   * @ctx:		pointer to a ring context structure
> + * @req:		pointer to a submitted request
>   * @opcode:		opcode of request
>   * @user_data:		user data associated with the request
>   * @force_nonblock:	whether a context blocking or not
> @@ -333,13 +333,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_complete,
>   */
>  TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
>  
> -	TP_PROTO(void *ctx, u8 opcode, u64 user_data, bool force_nonblock,
> -		 bool sq_thread),
> +	TP_PROTO(void *ctx, void *req, u8 opcode, u64 user_data,
> +		 bool force_nonblock, bool sq_thread),
>  
> -	TP_ARGS(ctx, opcode, user_data, force_nonblock, sq_thread),
> +	TP_ARGS(ctx, req, opcode, user_data, force_nonblock, sq_thread),
>  
>  	TP_STRUCT__entry (
>  		__field(  void *,	ctx		)
> +		__field(  void *,	req		)
>  		__field(  u8,		opcode		)
>  		__field(  u64,		user_data	)
>  		__field(  bool,		force_nonblock	)
> @@ -348,26 +349,42 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
>  
>  	TP_fast_assign(
>  		__entry->ctx		= ctx;
> +		__entry->req		= req;
>  		__entry->opcode		= opcode;
>  		__entry->user_data	= user_data;
>  		__entry->force_nonblock	= force_nonblock;
>  		__entry->sq_thread	= sq_thread;
>  	),
>  
> -	TP_printk("ring %p, op %d, data 0x%llx, non block %d, sq_thread %d",
> -			  __entry->ctx, __entry->opcode,
> -			  (unsigned long long) __entry->user_data,
> -			  __entry->force_nonblock, __entry->sq_thread)
> +	TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, op %d, data 0x%llx, non block %d, "
> +		  "sq_thread %d",  __entry->ctx, __entry->req,
> +		  __entry->opcode, (unsigned long long)__entry->user_data,
> +		  __entry->force_nonblock, __entry->sq_thread)
>  );
>  
> +/*
> + * io_uring_poll_arm - called after arming a poll wait if successful
> + *
> + * @ctx:		pointer to a ring context structure
> + * @req:		pointer to the armed request
> + * @opcode:		opcode of request
> + * @user_data:		user data associated with the request
> + * @mask:		request poll events mask
> + * @events:		registered events of interest
> + *
> + * Allows to track which fds are waiting for and what are the events of
> + * interest.
> + */
>  TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_poll_arm,
>  
> -	TP_PROTO(void *ctx, u8 opcode, u64 user_data, int mask, int events),
> +	TP_PROTO(void *ctx, void *req, u8 opcode, u64 user_data,
> +		 int mask, int events),
>  
> -	TP_ARGS(ctx, opcode, user_data, mask, events),
> +	TP_ARGS(ctx, req, opcode, user_data, events, fd),
>  
>  	TP_STRUCT__entry (
>  		__field(  void *,	ctx		)
> +		__field(  void *,	req		)
>  		__field(  u8,		opcode		)
>  		__field(  u64,		user_data	)
>  		__field(  int,		mask		)
> @@ -376,16 +393,17 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_poll_arm,
>  
>  	TP_fast_assign(
>  		__entry->ctx		= ctx;
> +		__entry->req		= req;
>  		__entry->opcode		= opcode;
>  		__entry->user_data	= user_data;
>  		__entry->mask		= mask;
>  		__entry->events		= events;
>  	),
>  
> -	TP_printk("ring %p, op %d, data 0x%llx, mask 0x%x, events 0x%x",
> -			  __entry->ctx, __entry->opcode,
> -			  (unsigned long long) __entry->user_data,
> -			  __entry->mask, __entry->events)
> +	TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, op %d, data 0x%llx, mask 0x%x, events 0x%x",
> +		  __entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->opcode,
> +		  (unsigned long long) __entry->user_data,
> +		  __entry->mask, __entry->events)
>  );
>  
>  TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_poll_wake,
> @@ -440,27 +458,40 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_task_add,
>  			  __entry->mask)
>  );
>  
> +/*
> + * io_uring_task_run - called when task_work_run() executes the poll events
> + *                     notification callbacks
> + *
> + * @ctx:		pointer to a ring context structure
> + * @req:		pointer to the armed request
> + * @opcode:		opcode of request
> + * @user_data:		user data associated with the request
> + *
> + * Allows to track when notified poll events are processed
> + */
>  TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_task_run,
>  
> -	TP_PROTO(void *ctx, u8 opcode, u64 user_data),
> +	TP_PROTO(void *ctx, void *req, u8 opcode, u64 user_data),
>  
> -	TP_ARGS(ctx, opcode, user_data),
> +	TP_ARGS(ctx, req, opcode, user_data),
>  
>  	TP_STRUCT__entry (
>  		__field(  void *,	ctx		)
> +		__field(  void *,	req		)
>  		__field(  u8,		opcode		)
>  		__field(  u64,		user_data	)
>  	),
>  
>  	TP_fast_assign(
>  		__entry->ctx		= ctx;
> +		__entry->req		= req;
>  		__entry->opcode		= opcode;
>  		__entry->user_data	= user_data;
>  	),
>  
> -	TP_printk("ring %p, op %d, data 0x%llx",
> -			  __entry->ctx, __entry->opcode,
> -			  (unsigned long long) __entry->user_data)
> +	TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, op %d, data 0x%llx",
> +		  __entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->opcode,
> +		  (unsigned long long) __entry->user_data)
>  );
>  
>  #endif /* _TRACE_IO_URING_H */
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

       reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <[email protected]>
2021-05-25  8:21 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-05-25  8:33   ` [PATCH] io_uring: Add to traces the req pointer when available Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-25 21:26     ` Olivier Langlois
2021-05-25 21:48       ` Olivier Langlois
2021-05-25 22:28         ` Jens Axboe
2021-05-26  8:28           ` Olivier Langlois
2021-05-25 21:29   ` Olivier Langlois
2021-05-26 12:38   ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-05-26 16:18     ` Olivier Langlois
2021-05-26 17:19       ` Olivier Langlois
2021-05-29 12:18         ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-28 22:42       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-29 12:30         ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-29 12:34           ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-29 17:55           ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox