From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Dmitry Kadashev <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] io_uring: add mkdir, [sym]linkat and mknodat support
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 20:37:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOKbgA4POGxPdB02NsCac4p6MtC97q6M3pT09_FWWj41Uf3K2A@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/22/21 11:49 PM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:32 AM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/22/21 11:28 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> On 6/22/21 6:26 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 6/22/21 5:56 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>>> On 6/3/21 6:18 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
>>>>>> This started out as an attempt to add mkdirat support to io_uring which
>>>>>> is heavily based on renameat() / unlinkat() support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> During the review process more operations were added (linkat, symlinkat,
>>>>>> mknodat) mainly to keep things uniform internally (in namei.c), and
>>>>>> with things changed in namei.c adding support for these operations to
>>>>>> io_uring is trivial, so that was done too. See
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20210514145259.wtl4xcsp52woi6ab@wittgenstein/
>>>>>
>>>>> io_uring part looks good in general, just small comments. However, I
>>>>> believe we should respin it, because there should be build problems
>>>>> in the middle.
>>>>
>>>> I can drop it, if Dmitry wants to respin. I do think that we could
>>>> easily drop mknodat and not really lose anything there, better to
>>>> reserve the op for something a bit more useful.
>>>
>>> I can try it and send a fold in, if you want.
>>> Other changes may be on top
>>
>> Sure that works too, will rebase in any case, and I'd like to add
>> Christian's ack as well. I'll just re-apply with the fold-ins.
>
> Jens, it seems that during this rebase you've accidentally squashed the
> "fs: update do_*() helpers to return ints" and
> "io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_SYMLINKAT" commits, so there is only the
> former one in your tree, but it actually adds the SYMLINKAT opcode to io uring
> (in addition to changing the helpers return types).
Man, I wonder what happened there. I'll just drop the series, so when you
resend this one (hopefully soon if it's for 5.14...), just make it
against the current branch.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-03 5:18 [PATCH v5 00/10] io_uring: add mkdir, [sym]linkat and mknodat support Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] fs: make do_mkdirat() take struct filename Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_MKDIRAT Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-22 11:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 11:50 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 6:41 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-23 11:53 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-24 11:11 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-24 12:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-28 8:17 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-07 14:06 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-12 12:44 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-12 13:14 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 17:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 0:41 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-23 5:50 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] fs: make do_mknodat() take struct filename Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] fs: make do_symlinkat() " Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] namei: add getname_uflags() Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] fs: make do_linkat() take struct filename Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] fs: update do_*() helpers to return ints Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_SYMLINKAT Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-22 11:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 5:45 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_LINKAT Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-22 11:48 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 6:09 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-23 13:13 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_MKNODAT Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-22 11:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 6:26 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-23 11:58 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-24 2:36 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-18 6:24 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] io_uring: add mkdir, [sym]linkat and mknodat support Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-18 16:10 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-21 15:21 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-22 8:12 ` Christian Brauner
2021-06-22 8:34 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-29 13:06 ` Christian Brauner
2021-06-22 17:26 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-22 8:26 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-21 15:57 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-21 15:59 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-22 11:56 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 17:26 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-22 17:28 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 17:32 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-23 5:37 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-23 5:49 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-24 2:37 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-06-24 10:55 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-23 5:35 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-24 2:37 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox