[PATCH 1/1] io_uring: fix io_queue_proc modifying req->flags

[Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>]

With multiple poll entries __io_queue_proc() might be running in
parallel with poll handlers and possibly task_work, we should not be
carelessly modifying req->flags there. io_poll_double_prepare() handles
a similar case with locking but it's much easier to move it into
__io_arm_poll_handler().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 595e52284d24a ("io_uring/poll: don't enable lazy wake for POLLEXCLUSIVE")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 io_uring/poll.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/poll.c b/io_uring/poll.c
index 053d738c330c..5f779139cae1 100644
--- a/io_uring/poll.c
+++ b/io_uring/poll.c
@@ -540,14 +540,6 @@ static void __io_queue_proc(struct io_poll *poll, struct io_poll_table *pt,
 	poll->wait.private = (void *) wqe_private;
 
 	if (poll->events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE) {
-		/*
-		 * Exclusive waits may only wake a limited amount of entries
-		 * rather than all of them, this may interfere with lazy
-		 * wake if someone does wait(events > 1). Ensure we don't do
-		 * lazy wake for those, as we need to process each one as they
-		 * come in.
-		 */
-		req->flags |= REQ_F_POLL_NO_LAZY;
 		add_wait_queue_exclusive(head, &poll->wait);
 	} else {
 		add_wait_queue(head, &poll->wait);
@@ -616,6 +608,17 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
 	if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED)
 		req->flags &= ~REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED;
 
+
+	/*
+	 * Exclusive waits may only wake a limited amount of entries
+	 * rather than all of them, this may interfere with lazy
+	 * wake if someone does wait(events > 1). Ensure we don't do
+	 * lazy wake for those, as we need to process each one as they
+	 * come in.
+	 */
+	if (poll->events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE)
+		req->flags |= REQ_F_POLL_NO_LAZY;
+
 	mask = vfs_poll(req->file, &ipt->pt) & poll->events;
 
 	if (unlikely(ipt->error || !ipt->nr_entries)) {
-- 
2.43.0