From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: flush completions for fallbacks
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:16:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
在 2021/8/20 下午5:49, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
> On 8/20/21 10:21 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
>> 在 2021/8/18 下午7:42, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
>>> io_fallback_req_func() doesn't expect anyone creating inline
>>> completions, and no one currently does that. Teach the function to flush
>>> completions preparing for further changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> fs/io_uring.c | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>>> index 3da9f1374612..ba087f395507 100644
>>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>>> @@ -1197,6 +1197,11 @@ static void io_fallback_req_func(struct work_struct *work)
>>> percpu_ref_get(&ctx->refs);
>>> llist_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, node, io_task_work.fallback_node)
>>> req->io_task_work.func(req);
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>>> + if (ctx->submit_state.compl_nr)
>>> + io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>> why do we protect io_submit_flush_completions() with uring_lock,
>> regarding that it is called in original context. Btw, why not
>> use ctx_flush_and_put()
>
> The fallback thing is called from a workqueue not the submitter task
> context. See delayed_work and so.
>
> Regarding locking, it touches struct io_submit_state, and it's protected by
> ->uring_lock. In particular we're interested in ->reqs and ->free_list.
> FWIW, there is refurbishment going on around submit state, so if proves
> useful the locking may change in coming months.
>
> ctx_flush_and_put() could have been used, but simpler to hand code it
> and avoid the (always messy) conditional ref grabbing and locking.
I didn't get it, what do you mean 'avoid the (always messy) conditional
ref grabbing and locking'? the code here and in ctx_flush_and_put() are
same..though I think in ctx_flush_and_put(), there is a problem that
compl_nr should also be protected.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-20 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-18 11:42 [PATCH 0/3] tw mutex & IRQ rw completion batching Pavel Begunkov
2021-08-18 11:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: flush completions for fallbacks Pavel Begunkov
2021-08-20 9:21 ` Hao Xu
2021-08-20 9:32 ` Hao Xu
2021-08-20 9:49 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-08-20 10:16 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-08-20 12:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-08-20 18:41 ` Hao Xu
2021-08-18 11:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: batch task work locking Pavel Begunkov
2021-08-18 11:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: IRQ rw completion batching Pavel Begunkov
2021-08-19 15:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] tw mutex & " Jens Axboe
2021-08-19 16:35 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=459bb482-e9bd-1457-95f9-3251394747c9@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox