From: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/7] io_uring: add napi busy polling support
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:22:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 15:59 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/30/24 2:20 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering what did happen to this patch submission...
> >
> > It seems like Stefan did put a lot of effort in addressing every
> > reported issue for several weeks/months...
> >
> > and then nothing... as if this patch has never been reviewed by
> > anyone...
> >
> > has it been decided to not integrate NAPI busy looping in io_uring
> > privately finally?
>
> It's really just waiting for testing, I want to ensure it's working
> as
> we want it to before committing. But the production bits I wanted to
> test on have been dragging out, hence I have not made any moves
> towards
> merging this for upstream just yet.
>
> FWIW, I have been maintaining the patchset, you can find the current
> series here:
>
> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux/log/?h=io_uring-napi
>
test setup:
-----------
- kernel 6.7.2 with Jens patchset applied (It did almost work as-is
except for modifs in io_uring/register.c that was in
io_uring/io_uring.c in 6.7.2)
- liburing 2.5 patched with Stefan patch after having carefully make
sure that IORING_REGISTER_NAPI,IORING_UNREGISTER_NAPI values match the
ones found in the kernel. (It was originally 26,27 and it is now 27,28)
- 3 threads each having their own private io_uring ring.
thread 1:
- use SQ_POLL kernel thread
- reads data stream from 15-20 TCP connections
- enable NAPI busy polling by calling io_uring_register_napi()
[2024-01-31 08:59:55] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 3(fd 43), napi_id:31
[2024-01-31 08:59:55] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 8(fd 38), napi_id:30
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 10(fd 36), napi_id:25
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 14(fd 32), napi_id:25
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 12(fd 34), napi_id:28
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 2(fd 44), napi_id:31
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 16(fd 30), napi_id:31
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 9(fd 37), napi_id:31
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 20(fd 26), napi_id:31
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 1(fd 45), napi_id:30
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 6(fd 40), napi_id:28
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 13(fd 33), napi_id:25
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 22(fd 22), napi_id:25
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 7(fd 39), napi_id:30
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 18(fd 28), napi_id:28
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 19(fd 27), napi_id:25
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1028
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 23(fd 21), napi_id:31
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 4(fd 42), napi_id:31
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 5(fd 41), napi_id:25
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 21(fd 24), napi_id:31
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 17(fd 29), napi_id:30
[2024-01-31 08:59:56] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 15(fd 31), napi_id:28
[2024-01-31 08:59:57] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1010
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 11(fd 35), napi_id:30
[2024-01-31 09:00:14] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1031
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 24(fd 25), napi_id:30
thread 2:
- No SQ_POLL
- reads data stream from 1 TCP socket
- enable NAPI busy polling by calling io_uring_register_napi()
[2024-01-31 09:01:45] INFO WSBASE/client_established 1031
LWS_CALLBACK_CLIENT_ESTABLISHED client 25(fd 23), napi_id:31
thread 3:
- No SQ_POLL
- No NAPI busy polling
- read data stream from 1 TCP socket
Outcome:
--------
I did not measure latency to make sure that NAPI polling was effective
but I did ensure the stability of running the patchset by letting the
program run for 5+ hours non stop without experiencing any glitches
Tested-by: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-08 16:38 [PATCH v15 0/7] io_uring: add napi busy polling support Stefan Roesch
2023-06-08 16:38 ` [PATCH v15 1/7] net: split off __napi_busy_poll from napi_busy_poll Stefan Roesch
2023-06-08 19:33 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-08 16:38 ` [PATCH v15 2/7] net: add napi_busy_loop_rcu() Stefan Roesch
2023-06-08 16:38 ` [PATCH v15 3/7] io-uring: move io_wait_queue definition to header file Stefan Roesch
2023-06-08 16:38 ` [PATCH v15 4/7] io-uring: add napi busy poll support Stefan Roesch
2023-06-08 16:38 ` [PATCH v15 5/7] io-uring: add sqpoll support for napi busy poll Stefan Roesch
2023-06-08 16:38 ` [PATCH v15 6/7] io_uring: add register/unregister napi function Stefan Roesch
2023-06-08 16:38 ` [PATCH v15 7/7] io_uring: add prefer busy poll to register and unregister napi api Stefan Roesch
2024-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v15 0/7] io_uring: add napi busy polling support Olivier Langlois
2024-01-30 22:59 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-31 5:30 ` Olivier Langlois
2024-01-31 17:22 ` Olivier Langlois [this message]
2024-01-31 17:32 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-31 17:59 ` Olivier Langlois
2024-01-31 19:56 ` Olivier Langlois
2024-01-31 20:52 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-31 21:03 ` Olivier Langlois
2024-02-02 20:20 ` Olivier Langlois
2024-02-02 22:58 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45a21ffe4878d77acba01ec43005c80a83f0e31a.camel@trillion01.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox