From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ispras.ru (mail.ispras.ru [83.149.199.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B222D6997A; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=83.149.199.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710256484; cv=none; b=twvP7hZ/V1PqZ+qEfLN7khUQ6ZTcRMyTmTin6+yOTyXdsyaiBY1qUCTMLqSIQR06Myv/DgdLaTysLTtRnpYNy+umSFYpr59+ggz0mGX/Atn3J/mYu77Uy8fr0YV1tTg5GRekrpb8HHyLqo0+VhyhOO/KvPOcuxNF2UXY8fQTyqA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710256484; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vO1UqO6McqxCN2tA+vaXaH1GgUv/t4jNkyN9AlqCpME=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=A/qHJGZmV/aE+5NCmgli5D7FhxisvOij4Ihkrqsr6TruWBNmtUoEFD4f5hKfhtiG1IJqnTuozpnQPXk2h1a5iUuiChTZQ7d3aRbrCp019RHkLnAbrgapMD7ecPW9/d4Tt9e+IzgGQe2ay2c6JHJaWqCpcpZF9xd6wbgI6veuEc8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ispras.ru; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ispras.ru; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ispras.ru header.i=@ispras.ru header.b=HA+Qbrc8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=83.149.199.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ispras.ru Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ispras.ru Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ispras.ru header.i=@ispras.ru header.b="HA+Qbrc8" Received: from localhost (unknown [46.242.8.170]) by mail.ispras.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3684440AC4FD; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:14:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.ispras.ru 3684440AC4FD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ispras.ru; s=default; t=1710256479; bh=/8irDg37OEF4CUrANR31ozt46LmJy7/pzEj+6BqzVfw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HA+Qbrc8RUBZjtO0qOieLKzQ8VaAUA1PaHmxNXnk+qDBU439oKFTUupfy2FcxWnYq 8iyDvECOIuHf1VanJuiFJCEBdn2VBC8b7juRTIvb3W7SHzuiX0TNkU4zv4zBUefmef /KNm+kRxdwvmJR0fvLTV+M6uAFDDNI23YSs9igEI= Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:14:38 +0300 From: Fedor Pchelkin To: Jens Axboe Cc: Pavel Begunkov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Khoroshilov , lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, Nikita Zhandarovich , Roman Belyaev Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10/5.15] io_uring: fix registered files leak Message-ID: <466e842f-66c6-4530-8c16-2b008fc3fbc6-pchelkin@ispras.ru> References: <20240312142313.3436-1-pchelkin@ispras.ru> <8a9993c7-fd4d-44ff-8971-af59c7f3052c@kernel.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a9993c7-fd4d-44ff-8971-af59c7f3052c@kernel.dk> On 24/03/12 08:34AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/12/24 8:23 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: [...] > > I feel io_uring-SCM related code should be dropped entirely from the > > stable branches as the backports already differ greatly between versions > > and some parts are still kept, some have been dropped in a non-consistent > > order. Though this might contradict with stable kernel rules or be > > inappropriate for some other reason. > > Looks fine to me, and I agree, it makes much more sense to drop it all > from 5.10/5.15-stable as well to keep them in sync with upstream. And I > think this is fine for stable, dropping code is always a good thing. > Alright, got it. So that would require dropping it from all of the supported 5.4, 6.1, 6.6, 6.7, too. Would it be okay if I'll send this as a series? -- Fedor