From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com [209.85.166.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5B8736CE0C for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 19:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.166.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755718572; cv=none; b=qwPtK+uDRiAbuQCaxSkvvuRrn3vk/rwywcJ4wWob+P38D/fWNUAjfHb5IAPIDSZPgmOAqMvbc9FvuJ8Q+sAAfQx3kInBeKXm4XnIbYfZhyq1FApvZaNdDBVTkiirH24kxmSuPDaYFGRZx0KsoB6CxY4V0qNGP2Vny+/zn4xG91c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755718572; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fS/09YLxWRt83swEvL434rci1Z30jMZQwSTy0hXoWpw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=eqqHBsrnMJD2xbeC5sby3WhEJYhA0M8MXvobQHMjr2Y3Ha7cRSVHprJSd+RINrPsQU6gpAPaBKUibxrA3VsQO5qILKi7XgSs+uejtwrP/W879pi7m0khOIYcrsx1j8Un12xBWskofMfl0lzL+VfHv87zPy2+wH3Ey5eyzRNoN8A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.dk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=N2xmSyfy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.166.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="N2xmSyfy" Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-8844ee2cb61so6526239f.2 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 12:36:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1755718569; x=1756323369; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=N4YHyRSPuWTa9KcBcli935wOTmatTFJLhoWf1OnFbB4=; b=N2xmSyfyTpQc4Evvf83WwqPnKXmcPFDNhw5hwH8BJhnk4Kz0Zl5eCs8wWULj1zuZpW 7aan0SWkTWZtfQncfoHmrapn5cjnhj5+0atp040atJLWUb0j1e0vA/ogXNQqGUuUX8to ecGFo5x0EfPaEn7YU8p5Zaba/qMbTZQIWBAbf75e7Rh8C9mWhGLhqfk3rASWYwdGshTd Hlccr+M7Fclts7ZLwnZFE5tzHAkKiYCe+iBskg+MXb2gaDGOfMSlNye0eMPcQVkhUu3N Z5X6A2OJelaAGLF5qZKsfyc4BAV6erZ7ebso+fbf8WckanhZvzeUoUIpf1G3mpRM7la4 clcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1755718569; x=1756323369; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=N4YHyRSPuWTa9KcBcli935wOTmatTFJLhoWf1OnFbB4=; b=AG3vlfRS+MblIo50ILWxGMOl4pGzZdqXgG+33Qb/pSzeXFnyK2dNVSUQ1pYEduibJw UnfL1vfCk/bDq4jIHtimoX9hai+w1Vn5xWOH5ZLFjI+g8/8W661LKIVvqNRT0SkPtgqM dH8Ea7PLpHHmxHUO5qHeowF06Jsz2UMHRseoBAQraYAxqIfRj2I0KZUhBAfrCojaGQNw fGyj57dwRQIgL1bWdws+B2KnnWUwdRF2ryJE1xWBzrwYwIs9pRcMVmAaPoTgcvcySZ3J uMshFnjS5okDo3JHeUFmNPd6rXG4gmg59cxxaWDcTAAFJ9sAF5qSF/Zva0e+AeaeIZiD dyIQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWMEcH+U3Cqgpt7ZfH04I6aofT3n/OLxqqsErXOlGqbGK/zNdKQe+uW79DS2G1Grs/d8EkG/ApJHw==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyeOXJ9f9HjjDM+4XNXMU+lvjZjtX/cWfobTV26UZwKeS0uDNj0 vnZX3LEsUBU/z4sVqLe2mAaxeJg1B+Le0JSVfLX4tSs33zIbTlorLGshvvS9A6dABbs= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctmAH94DjUJfaJK2FOuj4R036szQL/Fal12sYxMMa+qz40Bs3bgkEWjRf09MvY ujMjaroQ7fCe9nrJ86Radu0nD/UDTMIp2I071Hx8w2ZfFiR5kZPp4fR3hR7dmIwx/GwOaOCZTZR 1m5PHuhaK827bEV9QBvz3Ow7T+tzoW1s9vn47TY8gXMbgCJEV3oZX7NtYthzAT20Owiba07dBaN IxXK/p1XHKZ1YfZ5K3mFlk8QkGh1b+QR9n92e1g6qZunS/lBQN2bGLiiaAdq2Yxhk2QXqq1h6cl F9m5d2nDslZVfnUteL0zavb4GuPufvR4OyHnxvuX8gDUmmHlRaSphONNOPPthiOO/y8SPWFJ2Nz ZjXgr1S9Wf/9BL7QjdcU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEmYOPNvd37ugIRaNAONErKFhei/aUzDa8N8zotTuoMpenXVocJrjm57jsnvIaTATQ8ee8qaA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:160d:b0:861:6f49:626 with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-8847185c83cmr789082039f.6.1755718568576; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 12:36:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.116] ([96.43.243.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ca18e2360f4ac-884702457d5sm115648739f.17.2025.08.20.12.36.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Aug 2025 12:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46d0d30b-e9da-402d-9393-7877e9de117e@kernel.dk> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 13:36:07 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [zcrx-next 0/2] add support for synchronous refill To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org References: <175571405086.442349.7150561067887044481.b4-ty@kernel.dk> <20422c51-1227-42a8-8506-8f499eb53e89@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <20422c51-1227-42a8-8506-8f499eb53e89@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/20/25 1:33 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > On 8/20/25 20:02, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 8/20/25 12:57 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: >>> On 8/20/25 19:20, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 23:44:56 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote: >>>>> Returning buffers via a ring is efficient but can cause problems >>>>> when the ring doesn't have space. Add a way to return buffers >>>>> synchronously via io_uring "register" syscall, which should serve >>>>> as a slow fallback path. >>>>> >>>>> For a full branch with all relevant dependencies see >>>>> https://github.com/isilence/linux.git zcrx/for-next >>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>> >>>> Applied, thanks! >>> >>> Leave these and other series out please. I sent them for >>> review, but it'll be easier to keep in a branch and rebase >>> it if necessary. I hoped tagging with zcrx-next would be >>> good enough of a sign. >> >> Alright, but then please make it clear when you are sending >> something out for merging. > > That would be a pull request, should be obvious enough. Perhaps > it'd make sense to tag for review only patches. Any preference > what tag it should be or otherwise? Please just send patches rather than a pull request. PRs get messed up by people all the time, and there's no picking and choosing there, it's all or nothing. A review tag would be good in the subject, anything easily recognizable should do it. Like for-review or whatever, doesn't matter to me. -- Jens Axboe