From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>,
Martin Brandenburg <martin@omnibond.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"gfs2@lists.linux.dev" <gfs2@lists.linux.dev>,
"io-uring@vger.kernel.org" <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@lists.orangefs.org" <devel@lists.orangefs.org>,
"linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] fs: add a ->sync_lazytime method
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 07:50:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47527262-c79b-43da-ad72-f52474c2cf30@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114062642.1524837-12-hch@lst.de>
On 11/13/25 22:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Allow the file system to explicitly implement lazytime syncing instead
> of pigging back on generic inode dirtying. This allows to simplify
> the XFS implementation and prepares for non-blocking lazytime timestamp
> updates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst | 2 ++
> Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst | 6 ++++++
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
> index 77704fde9845..9b2f14ada8cd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ prototypes::
> ssize_t (*listxattr) (struct dentry *, char *, size_t);
> int (*fiemap)(struct inode *, struct fiemap_extent_info *, u64 start, u64 len);
> void (*update_time)(struct inode *, struct timespec *, int);
> + void (*sync_lazytime)(struct inode *inode);
> int (*atomic_open)(struct inode *, struct dentry *,
> struct file *, unsigned open_flag,
> umode_t create_mode);
> @@ -117,6 +118,7 @@ getattr: no
> listxattr: no
> fiemap: no
> update_time: no
> +sync_lazytime: no
> atomic_open: shared (exclusive if O_CREAT is set in open flags)
> tmpfile: no
> fileattr_get: no or exclusive
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> index 4f13b01e42eb..ff59760daae2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> @@ -486,6 +486,7 @@ As of kernel 2.6.22, the following members are defined:
> int (*getattr) (struct mnt_idmap *, const struct path *, struct kstat *, u32, unsigned int);
> ssize_t (*listxattr) (struct dentry *, char *, size_t);
> void (*update_time)(struct inode *, struct timespec *, int);
> + void (*sync_lazytime)(struct inode *inode);
> int (*atomic_open)(struct inode *, struct dentry *, struct file *,
> unsigned open_flag, umode_t create_mode);
> int (*tmpfile) (struct mnt_idmap *, struct inode *, struct file *, umode_t);
> @@ -642,6 +643,11 @@ otherwise noted.
> an inode. If this is not defined the VFS will update the inode
> itself and call mark_inode_dirty_sync.
>
> +``sync_lazytime``:
> + called by the writeback code to update the lazy time stamps to
> + regular time stamp updates that get syncing into the on-disk
> + inode.
> +
> ``atomic_open``
> called on the last component of an open. Using this optional
> method the filesystem can look up, possibly create and open the
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index ae6d1f1ccc71..7245f547416f 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1699,7 +1699,10 @@ bool sync_lazytime(struct inode *inode)
> return false;
>
> trace_writeback_lazytime(inode);
> - mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
> + if (inode->i_op->sync_lazytime)
> + inode->i_op->sync_lazytime(inode);
> + else
> + mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -2547,6 +2550,8 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
> trace_writeback_mark_inode_dirty(inode, flags);
>
> if (flags & I_DIRTY_INODE) {
> + bool was_dirty_time = true;
> +
> /*
> * Inode timestamp update will piggback on this dirtying.
> * We tell ->dirty_inode callback that timestamps need to
> @@ -2557,6 +2562,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
> if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) {
> inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME;
> flags |= I_DIRTY_TIME;
> + was_dirty_time = true;
> }
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> }
was_dirty_time is initialized it to true and above true again,
perhaps it should be initialized it to false, so it will be only set to
true when inode->i_state &= I_DIRTY_TIME; ?
if was_dirty_time always set to true at the time of initialization then
below check will always call as long as callback is set
inode->i_op->sync_lazytime(), irrespective of
inode->i_state &= I_DIRTY_TIME; assignment.
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 6:26 re-enable IOCB_NOWAIT writes to files Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] fs: refactor file timestamp update logic Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17 6:32 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-24 11:51 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] fs: lift the FMODE_NOCMTIME check into file_update_time_flags Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17 6:38 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-24 11:54 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] fs: export vfs_utimes Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17 6:38 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-24 11:55 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] btrfs: use vfs_utimes to update file timestamps Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] fs: remove inode_update_time Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17 6:59 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-19 6:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 13:06 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] organgefs: use inode_update_timestamps directly Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 14:06 ` Jeff Layton
2025-11-14 15:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 13:09 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] fs: return a negative error from generic_update_time Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17 7:07 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-24 13:10 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] fs: exit early in generic_update_time when there is no work Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 13:11 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] fs: factor out a mark_inode_dirty_time helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17 7:13 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-24 13:22 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-24 14:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] fs: factor out a sync_lazytime helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17 7:38 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-19 6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 13:31 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-24 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 17:36 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 11/14] fs: add a ->sync_lazytime method Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17 7:50 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 12/14] fs: add support for non-blocking timestamp updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 13/14] xfs: implement ->sync_lazytime Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 6:26 ` [PATCH 14/14] xfs: enable non-blocking timestamp updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-16 8:23 ` Dave Chinner
2025-11-19 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 14:04 ` re-enable IOCB_NOWAIT writes to files Jeff Layton
2025-11-14 15:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 19:47 ` Jeff Layton
2025-11-14 17:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-14 17:21 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47527262-c79b-43da-ad72-f52474c2cf30@nvidia.com \
--to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=devel@lists.orangefs.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hubcap@omnibond.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@omnibond.com \
--cc=shr@fb.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox