public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>,
	Martin Brandenburg <martin@omnibond.com>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"gfs2@lists.linux.dev" <gfs2@lists.linux.dev>,
	"io-uring@vger.kernel.org" <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devel@lists.orangefs.org" <devel@lists.orangefs.org>,
	"linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] fs: add a ->sync_lazytime method
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 07:50:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47527262-c79b-43da-ad72-f52474c2cf30@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114062642.1524837-12-hch@lst.de>

On 11/13/25 22:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Allow the file system to explicitly implement lazytime syncing instead
> of pigging back on generic inode dirtying.  This allows to simplify
> the XFS implementation and prepares for non-blocking lazytime timestamp
> updates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst |  2 ++
>   Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst     |  6 ++++++
>   fs/fs-writeback.c                     | 13 +++++++++++--
>   include/linux/fs.h                    |  1 +
>   4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
> index 77704fde9845..9b2f14ada8cd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ prototypes::
>   	ssize_t (*listxattr) (struct dentry *, char *, size_t);
>   	int (*fiemap)(struct inode *, struct fiemap_extent_info *, u64 start, u64 len);
>   	void (*update_time)(struct inode *, struct timespec *, int);
> +	void (*sync_lazytime)(struct inode *inode);
>   	int (*atomic_open)(struct inode *, struct dentry *,
>   				struct file *, unsigned open_flag,
>   				umode_t create_mode);
> @@ -117,6 +118,7 @@ getattr:	no
>   listxattr:	no
>   fiemap:		no
>   update_time:	no
> +sync_lazytime:	no
>   atomic_open:	shared (exclusive if O_CREAT is set in open flags)
>   tmpfile:	no
>   fileattr_get:	no or exclusive
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> index 4f13b01e42eb..ff59760daae2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> @@ -486,6 +486,7 @@ As of kernel 2.6.22, the following members are defined:
>   		int (*getattr) (struct mnt_idmap *, const struct path *, struct kstat *, u32, unsigned int);
>   		ssize_t (*listxattr) (struct dentry *, char *, size_t);
>   		void (*update_time)(struct inode *, struct timespec *, int);
> +		void (*sync_lazytime)(struct inode *inode);
>   		int (*atomic_open)(struct inode *, struct dentry *, struct file *,
>   				   unsigned open_flag, umode_t create_mode);
>   		int (*tmpfile) (struct mnt_idmap *, struct inode *, struct file *, umode_t);
> @@ -642,6 +643,11 @@ otherwise noted.
>   	an inode.  If this is not defined the VFS will update the inode
>   	itself and call mark_inode_dirty_sync.
>   
> +``sync_lazytime``:
> +	called by the writeback code to update the lazy time stamps to
> +	regular time stamp updates that get syncing into the on-disk
> +	inode.
> +
>   ``atomic_open``
>   	called on the last component of an open.  Using this optional
>   	method the filesystem can look up, possibly create and open the
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index ae6d1f1ccc71..7245f547416f 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1699,7 +1699,10 @@ bool sync_lazytime(struct inode *inode)
>   		return false;
>   
>   	trace_writeback_lazytime(inode);
> -	mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
> +	if (inode->i_op->sync_lazytime)
> +		inode->i_op->sync_lazytime(inode);
> +	else
> +		mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
>   	return false;
>   }
>   
> @@ -2547,6 +2550,8 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
>   	trace_writeback_mark_inode_dirty(inode, flags);
>   
>   	if (flags & I_DIRTY_INODE) {
> +		bool was_dirty_time = true;
> +
>   		/*
>   		 * Inode timestamp update will piggback on this dirtying.
>   		 * We tell ->dirty_inode callback that timestamps need to
> @@ -2557,6 +2562,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
>   			if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) {
>   				inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME;
>   				flags |= I_DIRTY_TIME;
> +				was_dirty_time = true;
>   			}
>   			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>   		}

was_dirty_time is initialized it to true and above true again,
perhaps it should be initialized it to false, so it will be only set to
true when inode->i_state &= I_DIRTY_TIME; ?

if was_dirty_time always set to true at the time of initialization then
below check will always call as long as callback is set
inode->i_op->sync_lazytime(), irrespective of
inode->i_state &= I_DIRTY_TIME; assignment.


-ck



  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-17  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-14  6:26 re-enable IOCB_NOWAIT writes to files Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] fs: refactor file timestamp update logic Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  6:32   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-24 11:51   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] fs: lift the FMODE_NOCMTIME check into file_update_time_flags Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  6:38   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-24 11:54   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] fs: export vfs_utimes Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  6:38   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-24 11:55   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] btrfs: use vfs_utimes to update file timestamps Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] fs: remove inode_update_time Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  6:59   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-19  6:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 13:06   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] organgefs: use inode_update_timestamps directly Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 14:06   ` Jeff Layton
2025-11-14 15:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 13:09   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] fs: return a negative error from generic_update_time Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  7:07   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-24 13:10   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] fs: exit early in generic_update_time when there is no work Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 13:11   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] fs: factor out a mark_inode_dirty_time helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  7:13   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-24 13:22   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-24 14:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] fs: factor out a sync_lazytime helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  7:38   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-19  6:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 13:31   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-24 14:09     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 17:36       ` Jan Kara
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 11/14] fs: add a ->sync_lazytime method Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  7:50   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 12/14] fs: add support for non-blocking timestamp updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 13/14] xfs: implement ->sync_lazytime Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 14/14] xfs: enable non-blocking timestamp updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 15:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-16  8:23   ` Dave Chinner
2025-11-19  7:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 14:04 ` re-enable IOCB_NOWAIT writes to files Jeff Layton
2025-11-14 15:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 19:47     ` Jeff Layton
2025-11-14 17:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-14 17:21     ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47527262-c79b-43da-ad72-f52474c2cf30@nvidia.com \
    --to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=devel@lists.orangefs.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hubcap@omnibond.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin@omnibond.com \
    --cc=shr@fb.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox