From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] async punting improvements for io_uring
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:17:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 864 bytes --]
On 24/02/2020 11:30, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> *on top of for-5.6*
Jens, let me know if this and the splice patchset should be rebased onto
your poll branch.
>
> This cleans up io-wq punting paths, doing small fixes and removing
> unnecessary logic from different submission paths.
>
> v2:
> - remove pid-related comment, as it's fixed separately
> - make ("add missing io_req_cancelled()") first
> in the series, so it may be picked for 5.6
>
> v3:
> - rebase + drop a patch definitely colliding with poll work
>
> Pavel Begunkov (3):
> io_uring: don't call work.func from sync ctx
> io_uring: don't do full *prep_worker() from io-wq
> io_uring: remove req->in_async
>
> fs/io_uring.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 8:30 [PATCH v3 0/3] async punting improvements for io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] io_uring: don't call work.func from sync ctx Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] io_uring: don't do full *prep_worker() from io-wq Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 15:30 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-24 15:48 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 15:57 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-24 15:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] io_uring: remove req->in_async Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 9:17 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-02-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] async punting improvements for io_uring Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox