public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], Lin Horse <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH for-6.1 1/1] io_uring: make poll refs more robust
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:39:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47cac5a4cb6b2e8d2f72f8f94adb088dbfd9308c.1668796727.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)

poll_refs carry two functions, the first is ownership over the request.
The second is notifying the io_poll_check_events() that there was an
event but wake up couldn't grab the ownership, so io_poll_check_events()
should retry.

We want to make poll_refs more robust against overflows. Instead of
always incrementing it, which covers two purposes with one atomic, check
if poll_refs is large and if so set a retry flag without attempts to
grab ownership. The gap between the bias check and following atomics may
seem racy, but we don't need it to be strict. Moreover there might only
be maximum 4 parallel updates: by the first and the second poll entries,
__io_arm_poll_handler() and cancellation. From those four, only poll wake
ups may be executed multiple times, but they're protected by a spin.

Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Lin Horse <[email protected]>
Fixes: aa43477b04025 ("io_uring: poll rework")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 io_uring/poll.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/poll.c b/io_uring/poll.c
index 055632e9092a..63f152332bf6 100644
--- a/io_uring/poll.c
+++ b/io_uring/poll.c
@@ -40,7 +40,15 @@ struct io_poll_table {
 };
 
 #define IO_POLL_CANCEL_FLAG	BIT(31)
-#define IO_POLL_REF_MASK	GENMASK(30, 0)
+#define IO_POLL_RETRY_FLAG	BIT(30)
+#define IO_POLL_REF_MASK	GENMASK(29, 0)
+#define IO_POLL_RETRY_MASK	(IO_POLL_REF_MASK | IO_POLL_RETRY_FLAG)
+
+/*
+ * We usually have 1-2 refs taken, 128 is more than enough and we want to
+ * maximise the margin between this amount and the moment when it overflows.
+ */
+#define IO_POLL_REF_BIAS	128
 
 #define IO_WQE_F_DOUBLE		1
 
@@ -58,6 +66,21 @@ static inline bool wqe_is_double(struct wait_queue_entry *wqe)
 	return priv & IO_WQE_F_DOUBLE;
 }
 
+static bool io_poll_get_ownership_slowpath(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+	int v;
+
+	/*
+	 * poll_refs are already elevated and we don't have much hope for
+	 * grabbing the ownership. Instead of incrementing set a retry flag
+	 * to notify the loop that there might have been some change.
+	 */
+	v = atomic_fetch_or(IO_POLL_RETRY_FLAG, &req->poll_refs);
+	if (!(v & IO_POLL_REF_MASK))
+		return !(atomic_fetch_inc(&req->poll_refs) & IO_POLL_REF_MASK);
+	return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * If refs part of ->poll_refs (see IO_POLL_REF_MASK) is 0, it's free. We can
  * bump it and acquire ownership. It's disallowed to modify requests while not
@@ -66,6 +89,8 @@ static inline bool wqe_is_double(struct wait_queue_entry *wqe)
  */
 static inline bool io_poll_get_ownership(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
+	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&req->poll_refs) >= IO_POLL_REF_BIAS))
+		return io_poll_get_ownership_slowpath(req);
 	return !(atomic_fetch_inc(&req->poll_refs) & IO_POLL_REF_MASK);
 }
 
@@ -233,7 +258,7 @@ static int io_poll_check_events(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
 		 * and all others are be lost. Redo vfs_poll() to get
 		 * up to date state.
 		 */
-		if ((v & IO_POLL_REF_MASK) != 1)
+		if ((v & IO_POLL_RETRY_MASK) != 1)
 			req->cqe.res = 0;
 
 		/* the mask was stashed in __io_poll_execute */
@@ -274,7 +299,7 @@ static int io_poll_check_events(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
 		 * Release all references, retry if someone tried to restart
 		 * task_work while we were executing it.
 		 */
-	} while (atomic_sub_return(v & IO_POLL_REF_MASK, &req->poll_refs));
+	} while (atomic_sub_return(v & IO_POLL_RETRY_MASK, &req->poll_refs));
 
 	return IOU_POLL_NO_ACTION;
 }
@@ -590,7 +615,7 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
 		 * locked, kick it off for them.
 		 */
 		v = atomic_dec_return(&req->poll_refs);
-		if (unlikely(v & IO_POLL_REF_MASK))
+		if (unlikely(v & IO_POLL_RETRY_MASK))
 			__io_poll_execute(req, 0);
 	}
 	return 0;
-- 
2.38.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-18 18:39 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-11-18 18:46 ` [PATCH for-6.1 1/1] io_uring: make poll refs more robust Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47cac5a4cb6b2e8d2f72f8f94adb088dbfd9308c.1668796727.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox