From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] io_uring/epoll: add support for IORING_OP_EPOLL_WAIT
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 23:27:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2/7/25 17:32, Jens Axboe wrote:
> For existing epoll event loops that can't fully convert to io_uring,
> the used approach is usually to add the io_uring fd to the epoll
> instance and use epoll_wait() to wait on both "legacy" and io_uring
> events. While this work, it isn't optimal as:
>
> 1) epoll_wait() is pretty limited in what it can do. It does not support
> partial reaping of events, or waiting on a batch of events.
>
> 2) When an io_uring ring is added to an epoll instance, it activates the
> io_uring "I'm being polled" logic which slows things down.
>
> Rather than use this approach, with EPOLL_WAIT support added to io_uring,
> event loops can use the normal io_uring wait logic for everything, as
> long as an epoll wait request has been armed with io_uring.
>
> Note that IORING_OP_EPOLL_WAIT does NOT take a timeout value, as this
> is an async request. Waiting on io_uring events in general has various
> timeout parameters, and those are the ones that should be used when
> waiting on any kind of request. If events are immediately available for
> reaping, then This opcode will return those immediately. If none are
> available, then it will post an async completion when they become
> available.
>
> cqe->res will contain either an error code (< 0 value) for a malformed
> request, invalid epoll instance, etc. It will return a positive result
> indicating how many events were reaped.
>
> IORING_OP_EPOLL_WAIT requests may be canceled using the normal io_uring
> cancelation infrastructure. The poll logic for managing ownership is
> adopted to guard the epoll side too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 4 +
> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 1 +
> io_uring/cancel.c | 5 ++
> io_uring/epoll.c | 143 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> io_uring/epoll.h | 22 +++++
> io_uring/io_uring.c | 5 ++
> io_uring/opdef.c | 14 ++++
> 7 files changed, 194 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
> index e2fef264ff8b..031ba708a81d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
> @@ -369,6 +369,10 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
...
> +bool io_epoll_wait_remove_all(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_uring_task *tctx,
> + bool cancel_all)
> +{
> + return io_cancel_remove_all(ctx, tctx, &ctx->epoll_list, cancel_all, __io_epoll_wait_cancel);
> +}
> +
> +int io_epoll_wait_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_cancel_data *cd,
> + unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> + return io_cancel_remove(ctx, cd, issue_flags, &ctx->epoll_list, __io_epoll_wait_cancel);
> +}
> +
> +static void io_epoll_retry(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_tw_state *ts)
> +{
> + int v;
> +
> + do {
> + v = atomic_read(&req->poll_refs);
> + if (unlikely(v != 1)) {
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(v & IO_POLL_REF_MASK)))
> + return;
> + if (v & IO_POLL_CANCEL_FLAG) {
> + __io_epoll_cancel(req);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> + v &= IO_POLL_REF_MASK;
> + } while (atomic_sub_return(v, &req->poll_refs) & IO_POLL_REF_MASK);
I actually looked up the epoll code this time. If we disregard
cancellations, you have only 1 wait entry, which should've been removed
from the queue by io_epoll_wait_fn(), in which case the entire loop is
doing nothing as there is no one to race with. ->hash_node is the only
shared part, but it's sync'ed by the mutex.
As for cancellation, epoll_wait_remove() also removes the entry, and
you can rely on it to tell if the entry was removed inside, from
which you derive if you're the current owner.
Maybe this handling might be useful for the multishot mode, perhaps
along the lines of:
io_epoll_retry()
{
do {
res = epoll_get_events();
if (one_shot || cancel) {
wq_remove();
unhash();
complete_req(res);
return;
}
post_cqe(res);
// now recheck if new events came while we were processing
// the previous batch.
} while (refs_drop(req->poll_refs));
}
epoll_issue(issue_flags) {
queue_poll();
return;
}
But it might be better to just poll the epoll fd, reuse all the
io_uring polling machinery, and implement IO_URING_F_MULTISHOT for
the epoll opcode.
epoll_issue(issue_flags) {
if (!(flags & IO_URING_F_MULTISHOT))
return -EAGAIN;
res = epoll_check_events();
post_cqe(res);
etc.
}
I think that would make this patch quite trivial, including
the multishot mode.
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-08 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 17:32 [PATCHSET v3 0/7] io_uring epoll wait support Jens Axboe
2025-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/7] eventpoll: abstract out ep_try_send_events() helper Jens Axboe
2025-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] eventpoll: abstract out parameter sanity checking Jens Axboe
2025-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 3/7] eventpoll: add epoll_queue() interface Jens Axboe
2025-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 4/7] eventpoll: add helper to remove wait entry from wait queue head Jens Axboe
2025-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 5/7] io_uring/epoll: remove CONFIG_EPOLL guards Jens Axboe
2025-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] io_uring/poll: pull ownership handling into poll.h Jens Axboe
2025-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 7/7] io_uring/epoll: add support for IORING_OP_EPOLL_WAIT Jens Axboe
2025-02-08 23:27 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2025-02-09 0:24 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-09 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox