From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: briefly loose locks while reaping events
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 08:50:18 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 7/6/20 8:45 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>
>
> On 06/07/2020 17:42, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 06/07/2020 17:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 7/6/20 8:14 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> It's not nice to hold @uring_lock for too long io_iopoll_reap_events().
>>>> For instance, the lock is needed to publish requests to @poll_list, and
>>>> that locks out tasks doing that for no good reason. Loose it
>>>> occasionally.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/io_uring.c | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>>>> index 020944a193d0..568e25bcadd6 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>>>> @@ -2059,11 +2059,14 @@ static void io_iopoll_reap_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>>>>
>>>> io_iopoll_getevents(ctx, &nr_events, 1);
>>>>
>>>> + /* task_work takes the lock to publish a req to @poll_list */
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>>>> /*
>>>> * Ensure we allow local-to-the-cpu processing to take place,
>>>> * in this case we need to ensure that we reap all events.
>>>> */
>>>> cond_resched();
>>>> + mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>>>> }
>>>> mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>>>> }
>>>
>>> This would be much better written as:
>>>
>>> if (need_resched()) {
>>> mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>>> cond_resched();
>>> mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>>> }
>>>
>>> to avoid shuffling the lock when not needed to. Every cycle counts for
>>> polled IO.
>>
>> It happens only when io_uring is being killed, can't imagine any sane app
>> trying to catch CQEs after doing that. I'll resend
>
> Also, io_iopoll_getevents() already does need_resched(). Hmm, do you wan't
> me to resend?
I missed this was the "reap on dead" path. But yes, please resend.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-06 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-06 14:14 [PATCH 0/3] iopoll improvements Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: don't delay iopoll'ed req completion Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: fix stopping iopoll'ing too early Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 14:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: briefly loose locks while reaping events Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 14:31 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-06 14:42 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 14:45 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 14:50 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox